Answer:
sorry but i don't understand.
Step-by-step explanation:
Ah yes, x=9
i hate the 20 words long thing or whatever
Answer:
In 2010 the population become 206,123,000.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the provided equation.

Where P represents the population in millions.
We need to determine the year in which the country had population of 206,123,000.
As P is in millions so divide 206,123,000 by one million.

Substitute P = 206.123 in above equation.




30 year from 1980 the population become 206,123,000.
In 2010 the population become 206,123,000.
Answer:
3 socks
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that, there are 10 red socks and 10 blue socks which are mixed up in the dresser drawer.
The socks are identical except the color.
We need to find out, the minimum number of socks to be taken out from the dark room so that there is at least a pair of matching socks comes out of the drawer.
Let us consider the cases:
First Two socks pulled out of the drawer.
Case 1: Both are red or both are blue.
In this case, the matching pair is ready.
But there can be other case as well.
Case 2:
One red and one blue color taken out.
Now, when we pull the third, there will be either red or blue.
That will make a pair.
Therefore, to cover up all the cases and to be certain to get a matching pair out of the drawer, <em>at least 3 socks must be taken out</em>.
So, the answer is:
We need to take out at least 3 socks.
Answer:
- (x, y) = (3, 5)
- (x, y) = (1, 2)
Step-by-step explanation:
A nice graphing calculator app makes these trivially simple. (See the first two attachments.) It is available for phones, tablets, and as a web page.
__
The usual methods of solving a system of equations involve <em>elimination</em> or <em>substitution</em>.
There is another method that is relatively easy to use. It is a variation of "Cramer's Rule" and is fully equivalent to <em>elimination</em>. It makes use of a formula applied to the equation coefficients. The pattern of coefficients in the formula, and the formula itself are shown in the third attachment. I like this when the coefficient numbers are "too messy" for elimination or substitution to be used easily. It makes use of the equations in standard form.
_____
1. In standard form, your equations are ...
Then the solution is ...

__
2. In standard form, your equations are ...
Then the solution is ...

_____
<em>Note on Cramer's Rule</em>
The equation you will see for Cramer's Rule applied to a system of 2 equations in 2 unknowns will have the terms in numerator and denominator swapped: ec-bf, for example, instead of bf-ec. This effectively multiplies both numerator and denominator by -1, so has no effect on the result.
The reason for writing the formula in the fashion shown here is that it makes the pattern of multiplications and subtractions easier to remember. Often, you can do the math in your head. This is the method taught by "Vedic maths" and/or "Singapore math." Those teaching methods tend to place more emphasis on mental arithmetic than we do in the US.