Answer:
Unified the allies front against the axis
Explanation:
The United States was a key player in the Second world war. As the Japanese forces rallied at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, they took the Americans by surprise. What resulted was a mammoth loss of life totaling around 2300 people. A massive impact on the American navy fleet and chief of all, a huge depletion of the American oil storage. Had the Japanese pressed further, almost all the oil reserves in the tankers held at the harbor would have been destroyed. On this account, the war could have even lasted much more longer.
The attack on the Harbor dealt a huge blow on the American people, it united a divided nation for war. What followed was a deadly response from American. It spurred the nation to go for the war.
As new constitutions were ratified, the rights were amended.
Peter the Great was Tsar of all Russia from 1682-1721 and then emperor of Russia from 1721 until his death in 1725.
Answer:
<h2>Spread throughout the organisation</h2>
Explanation:
The organisations in which mid and lower-level managers make most of the decisions is called decentralised organisation. In it higher authority is given to workers and functionaries. While in the centralised organisations all the decisions are made by the manager at the top.
All organisations are decentralised to some extent. However the extent of decentralisation differ from organisation to organisation. In strongly centralised organisations although the authority is delegated to lower-level managers they do not have much freedom to make decisions.
Answer: 360 degrees feedback mechanism
Explanation: It is often difficult to see exactly your own flaws. Knowing our own flaws is important to distinguish which flaws we can change and which ones we don't, and thus accept them, which increases our confidence. And in the assessment of our own flaws we can go wrong, so it is best if we seek feedback from the environment. The best is the so-called 360 degree feedback. It's feedback where we collect information about ourselves from colleagues, supervisors, and subordinates, family, friends, and include our own assessment of our flaws. But also all those who are in daily contact with us, which is because of work or other needs, that is, all those who cooperate with us daily and can evaluate what shortcomings we have. So we've collected feedback from literally the whole environment, the entire 360 degree circle, and so we can best evaluate our own flaws by taking feedback information from all sides. One of the sides can also give a bit more subjectivity, not to say the wrong feedback, and the overall impression made up of feedback from all sides is the best. That's why this feedback is also called multiple source feedback.
