I'm not sure of the exact word you are looking for, but the general idea is that the federal law will always reign supreme if there is ever a conflict between the federal and state laws. Federal law is superior or higher-ranking or more preferable, etc.
Here is the exact phrasing from Article VI of the US Constitution: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
The way in which Plato and More discuss members of the ruling class differently is D. Plato tries to remedy the social divide, while more provides a plan for their governing style.
<h3>What is a Ruling Class?</h3>
This refers to the hierarchy of rule that allows a group of elites to be in charge of the governing of the people,.
Hence, we can see that The way in which Plato and More discuss members of the ruling class differently is D. Plato tries to remedy the social divide, while more provides a plan for their governing style.
Read more about Plato here:
brainly.com/question/742055
#SPJ1
<u>Answer</u>:
C) Taney can not deny Scott citizenship because it is federal right.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The counterclaim is the opposite view of the claim statement. The counterclaim showing the strong viewpoint of your research that you have done thorough research and even considered the other's viewpoint also. With the supporting evidence, the researcher can use the counterclaim supporting evidence. The claim never goes unsupported. The credible source could be the newspaper, websites, encyclopedia, and many more resources are there to support the claim.
Answer:
Appeal to force
Explanation:
Appeal to Force is a threat, whereby the speaker personally threatens to do something to punish the listener. In this scenario, congressman Baxter was threatened to support the bill. This is an example of the fallacy, appeal to force/argumentum ad baculum
Irrigation was a Sumerian invention, which included major components like canals, gated ditches, levees, and gates. Its two purposes were to (1) to water the crops using w<span>ater carried from the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers to the fields where the crops were located, and (2) </span><span>to protect Mesopotamia, from the threat of flooding.</span>
