1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serious [3.7K]
3 years ago
9

Why do you think many people refiused to obey the fugutive slave act

History
1 answer:
Aneli [31]3 years ago
7 0
Slaveholders could seize an alleged runaway in free territory and bring the accused before a federal judge or local magistrate to prove title to the slave and obtain a certificate of rendition entitling the master to remove the slave from the free jurisdiction. The law placed most of the burden of slave catching on masters, including the burden of dealing with uncooperative Northerners, and it made rendition hearings inconvenient to arrange because few federal judges were available to participate. The 1850 Fugitive Slave Act provided for federal circuit courts to designate commissioners specifically to hear rendition proceedings, and it authorized commissioners and federal marshals to form a posse of bystanders to capture runaways.
You might be interested in
Warned that going to a temple was not enough all must work for just society
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

warned that going to a temple was not enough all must work for just society

Explanation:

you already give the answer

6 0
3 years ago
What law most affected John D. Rockefeller?
xenn [34]
Antitrust law having a monopoly of any one business, oil in his case
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how were the policies of massive retaliation and brinkmanship different from previous military policies?
Schach [20]
Previous military policies had created massive killings throughout long years on a war of aggression. Brinkmanship, as showed in history was used to let another country stop its war through massive retaliation. It is a more dangerous option to use nuclear weapons as a sign of power and capability to kill more people including civilians in a fast mode.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explorers had to be careful not to journey into Texas, because the French would attack them.
blsea [12.9K]
True very much true God bless!!!
3 0
2 years ago
Which two sentences explain the North's opposition to the use of slavery in the South?
RideAnS [48]
It's definitely A as one answer, but I'm unsure about the other answer. But I can almost 100% say that C is most likely the second answer. I hope I helped in some ways!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Jones County Schools
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the US want to overthrow Fidel Castro when he took control of Cuba?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these is a power of the united states president?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the development of writing change the lives of the ancient egyptians?
    14·1 answer
  • All 55 delegates that attended the Constitutional Convention signed the final document. Is this true or false?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Pope Gregory VII and Henry IV come into conflict?
    10·2 answers
  • The article of confederation was approved by only 10 states ? True or false
    7·2 answers
  • Xplain how the actions of early presidential administrations established a strong federal government and provided a peaceful tra
    12·1 answer
  • What is cultural significance of tea in the UK?
    9·2 answers
  • How did the wealthy italians, like the medici, show off their wealth? [choose all that apply]
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!