1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinvika [58]
3 years ago
10

Read the excerpt from "mother tongue." lately, ive been giving more thought to the kind of english my mother speaks. like others

, i have described it to people as broken or fractured english. but i wince when i say that. it has always bothered me that i can think of no other way to describe it other than broken, as if it were damaged and needed to be fixed, as if it lacked a certain wholeness and soundness. what best supports the inference that tan believes nonstandard english is no less valid than standard english? tan spends a lot of time thinking about her mothers fractured english. tan has trouble thinking of descriptive words when she is writing. tans american education makes it difficult for her to understand her mother. tan winces when she describes her mothers english as broken.
English
2 answers:
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer :

The following option best supports the inference that tan believes nonstandard English is no less valid than standard English :

Tan winces when she describes her mothers English as broken.

Tan winces because she considers her mother's nonstandard English as her mother tongue. It is perfectly clear and natural to her. It is full of vivid descriptions, clear observations and imagery. Nonstandard English is close to her heart because it is the language that helped her to make sense of the world.

Tanzania [10]3 years ago
3 0
<span>The Answer should be, Tan winces when she describes her mother's English as "broken."</span>
You might be interested in
Where would the comma go? The salmon which I personally caught tasted great.
iragen [17]
The comma should go after "The salmon" <span>The </span><span>salmon, which I personally caught tasted great. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is this right? Please help me
PSYCHO15rus [73]
I would put C. it makes the most sense to me
7 0
3 years ago
Matt Sorum was playing with The Cult, and he was recruited by Slash of Guns and Roses, so he played with Guns and Roses, but he
zhuklara [117]
I do believe the answer you're looking for is A. :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Cindy is reading a poem. She is surprised by how the poet is able to present new and unexpected comparisons between unlike subje
Karolina [17]
It is helpful when you know what each of the terms mean.

Allusion - "a brief and indirect reference to a person, place, thing or idea of historical, cultural, literary or political significance. It does not describe in detail the person or thing to which it refers. It is just a passing comment and the writer expects the reader to possess enough knowledge to spot the allusion and grasp its importance in a text." Ex., Don't be such a Romeo. -  this would be a reference to Romeo and Juliet in which someone is probably telling someone else t not be so romantic.

Simile - Compares two objects using "like" or "as." Ex., "Rebecca is as fast as a cheetah."

Imagery - basically visually descriptive or figurative language. So basically writing so good that all your senses can know what the writer is writing about. Ex., "The tiny red ant climbed up the broken twig" - imagery appealing to your sight.

Personification - Giving non-living objects human traits. Ex., "The wind howled and cried, warning the earth for the danger to come."

Now that you know what each of these mean, think about which choice it can be. If you need any more help, just let me know. I know there is more than one literary devices in the list that you can use to compare, but which one is able to present new and unexpected comparisons between *unlike* subjects?

6 0
3 years ago
How do you know that Helios's cattle will be slain? the odyssey
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

Because Tiresias says so in Book 11.

Explanation:

In Book 11 of the epic poem "The Odyssey", the main character Odysseus descends into the Underworld. There, he meets Tiresias, a legendary prophet, who gives him a warning. Tiresias tells Odysseus that if he and his men wish to come home soon and unharmed, they must learn to curb their desires. Tiresias knows, however, that Odysseus' men won't be able to do so. For that reason, he also warns Odysseus about Helio's cattle. The cattle are sacred, special, and should not be killed and eaten like regular animals. If his men end up killing the cattle, they will be murdered; Odysseus will have to return home alone, late, and as a broken man. That prediction is exactly what happens.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Corinne was definitely the right person for the job. This is an example of which type of sentence.
    9·2 answers
  • Which transitional word or phrase shows a sequential relationship among ideas? A. because B. although C. for example D. finally
    10·2 answers
  • What is a preconceived notion about a group?
    11·2 answers
  • Hello help please please...
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a biased statement?
    11·2 answers
  • I will give Brainliest to person who's right and gives best answer.
    9·1 answer
  • Read the passage from chapter 14 of The Prince.
    9·1 answer
  • Unscramble the words below to write
    14·1 answer
  • What does the two beds scratched in leaves mean in the book where the red fern grows?​
    7·1 answer
  • Somebody help please
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!