I think the greatest reward is the knowledge that he or she has discharged the duty faithfully, honorably, and well!
Have a nice day,And good luck!!!
The above question has multiple choices;
a. Cognition
b. Correlation
c. Causation
d. Contextualization
The answer is
B
The above sentence mentions nothing that the development of henry Bessemer's invention was made possible only because of Abraham darby's invention. Thus, both inventions have a correlation relationship with one another and do not indicate an event is the occurrence of the other event.
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
The industrial revolution created more classes, not less. Therefore, arguments about larger gaps in social classes are difficult to support, Prior to the industrial revolution two main classes existed. The landed nobility and their poor farm workers.
The mid-west region was most common in the 19th century
