Answer:
Yanta Co. has a higher exposure to exchange rate risk than Diz Co.
The reason is that Yanta Co. does not have net inflows of euros. Instead, its euro transactions yield net outflows.
It will always be in need of euros to settle its foreign debts or obligations, unlike Diz Co. with foreign assets.
Explanation:
a) Data and Analysis:
Diz Co. has net cash inflows of euros and net cash inflows of swiss francs
Yanta Co. has net cash outflows of euros and net cash inflows of swiss francs
b) Exposure to exchange rate risk or currency risk is the financial risk arising from fluctuations in the value of the US dollars against the Euro or Swiss Francs in which Diz Co. has some foreign assets while Yanta Co. has foreign obligations.
Answer:
B. price subject
Explanation:
For this contract to be enforceable, it must include price, matter and delivery date. These aspects are all best essential and should be included in the contract. From the question when Jaime wrote the contract he failed to detail the price they agreed upon. Even though the rest were included. Therefore this contract cannot be enforced since it is missing this important aspect. Option b is the answer to the question
Based on the information given the amount of the transfer taxes is $476.
Using this formula
Total transfer tax=[(Purchased price+ First transfer tax)×(Additional tax)]+Transfer tax
Let plug in the formula
Total transfer tax=[($475,000-$1,000)×($0.10/$100)]+$2
Total transfer tax = ([$474,000 x .001] + $2)
Total transfer tax=$474+$2
Total transfer tax=$476
Inconclusion the amount of the transfer taxes is $476.
Learn more here:brainly.com/question/17122829
I'm not 100% sue but I think the answer is option D: District boundaries will remain the same, but the voting pattern will shift from Republican to Democratic. Hope this helps!
Answer:
nonfinancial ethical performance.
Explanation:
In the context of manufacturing, process variations refers to changes in a repeatable process that should yield the same results every time but has not done so this time. This being the case since it is dependent on human error and not finances it can be said that Mr. Fisherman is measuring nonfinancial ethical performance. In order to find what defect made him miss his goal.