Answer:
The answer is C The difference between the value of the camera accepted and its value if it had been as warranted, medical costs for treating the grandfather's burns, and the cost to replace the grandfathers coat.
Explanation:
(C)When a buyer accepts goods that turn out to be defective, he may recover as damages any "loss resulting in the normal course of events from the breach," which includes the difference between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, plus incidental and consequential damages. Incidental damages resulting from the seller's breach include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt, and transportation, care, and custody of goods rightfully rejected. In this case, the grandfather incurred no incidental damages. Consequential damages resulting from the seller's breach include any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise, and injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty. Here, the grandfather is entitled to breach of warranty damages for the loss of the camera—the difference between the value of the camera accepted and its value if it had been as warranted—plus damages for injury to his person (e.g., medical costs for treating the grandfather's burns) and property (i.e., the cost to replace his coat) because they were proximately caused from the breach of warranty. Thus, (C) is correct, and (A) and (B) are wrong. (D) is wrong because the cost of hiring the professional photographer was not foreseeable. The seller was not told of any particular requirements and needs of the grandfather at the time of contracting nor would the seller have reason to know that the grandfather planned to use the camera to take pictures of his grandson's graduation and would hire a professional photographer if he lost the use of the camera.
Answer:
D) arbitrary inference
Explanation:
Arbitrary inference: In psychology, the term arbitrary inference refers to a form of cognitive bias whereby an individual quickly draws a specific conclusion about something in the absence of any requisite evidence. It was developed by Aaron T. Beck during 1979 and is considered to be a tenet of cognitive therapy.
In the question above, the cognitive distortion involved is an arbitrary inference.
Answer:
Significant outcome
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A. mutually exclusive result
B. subjective outcome
C. significant outcome
D. conditional result
One of the most common and important tasks of scientists is coming up with hypotheses. A hypothesis is a supposition on how something works that is based on very limited evidence. Because hypotheses are preliminary suppositions, they have to be confirmed. When a scientist obtains meaningful results that confirm their hypothesis, this is known as a significant outcome.
