1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
3 years ago
9

Impact of americanization to canada

Social Studies
2 answers:
snow_tiger [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In its most blunt form, "Americanization" removes the ability to appreciate cultural diversity. If Americanization results in products, goods, and consciousness that reflects only what is present in America, heterogeneity is lost. Americanization tends to expand and subsume other cultural notions of the good.

VikaD [51]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: influence is enormous and not only negative of course. The most important is the fact that this influence existed already in the 18th century and can be expressed as - materialism, -English language (in Quebec especially), protestant religion (for Catholics in Quebec), - many Canadians (Quebeckers) migrated to wealthier southern neighbour, - American war for independence had a very significant influence on small Canadian population

Explanation: today´s Trumps governments contributes to major visibility of Canada in its attempt to become open for immigration and to treat democratically immigrants from all over the world. According to some Trump is helping Canada to become more visible and to get a very good "label" internationally.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP A major development in relations between the Soviet Union and the United States occurred in the late 1980’s when the
White raven [17]

Answer:

About the author

Rebecca Johnson

Rebecca Johnson is Executive Director of the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy.

Established upon the ashes of the Second World War to represent “We the Peoples”, it is not surprising that both peace and security were fundamental objectives for the United Nations. While many also wanted disarmament, countervailing lessons were drawn by some political leaders, which made it difficult to get multilateral agreements on disarmament for several decades. Debates around nuclear weapons epitomized and sharpened the challenges. Academics in the United States of America led in developing theories of deterrence to provide legitimacy for these weapons of mass destruction, which soon became embedded in the military doctrines and political rhetoric of further Governments, from NATO allies to the Eastern bloc and beyond. Deterrence theory sought to invert the normative relationship between peace and disarmament by arguing that nuclear weapons were actually peacekeepers amassed to deter aggressors rather than to fight them. From there it became a short step for some countries—including permanent Members of the Security Council of the United Nations—to promote ideologies that equated security and peace with high “defence” budgets and military-industrial dependence on arms manufacture and trade. This is the backdrop for understanding how the United Nations System and disarmament approaches have intersected since 1945, and the way in which reframing disarmament as a universal humanitarian imperative has opened more productive opportunities for future multilateral disarmament treaties.

The very first resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations, in January 1946, addressed the “problems raised by the discovery of atomic energy”. Despite civil society’s efforts, led by scientists and women’s peace organizations, leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union rejected measures to curb nuclear ambitions. As the cold war took hold, the leaders that had emerged “victorious” in 1945 raced each other to manufacture and deploy all kinds of new weapons and war technologies, especially nuclear, chemical and biological weapons (notwithstanding the 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibiting the use of chemical and biological weapons in war) and a variety of missiles to deliver them speedily anywhere in the world.

After early efforts to control nuclear developments floundered, it was the upsurge of health and environmental concerns provoked by nuclear testing that led the Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Japanese Parliament to call for such explosions to be halted altogether. After an egregiously irresponsible 15 megaton thermonuclear bomb was tested in the Marshall Islands on 1 March 1954, Nehru submitted his proposal for a Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) to the United Nations Disarmament Commission on 29 July 1954. Since then CTBT has been the centrepiece of disarmament demands from many States, especially the developing countries of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Intended as a first step towards disarmament, the driving force behind CTBT was concern about the humanitarian impacts. Early attempts at multilateral negotiations through a newly created Ten-Nation Committee on Disarmament made little progress. Although the leaders of the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom professed their desire for a CTBT, their talks kept stalling. Obstacles from the nuclear laboratories and security advisors were dressed up as verification problems, but they stemmed from these nuclear-armed Governments’ military ambitions and rivalries, and their shared determination to keep their own weapons options open, even as they sought to limit those of others.

From 1959 to 1961, various resolutions were adopted by the General Assembly aimed at preventing the testing, acquisition, use, deployment and proliferation of nuclear weapons. In 1961, for example, General Assembly resolution 1664 (XVI) recognized that “the countries not possessing nuclear weapons have a grave interest, and an important part to fulfil” in halting nuclear tests and achieving nuclear disarmament. General Assembly resolution 1653 (XVI) went further, noting that the targets of nuclear weapons would not just be “enemies” but “peoples of the world not involved in…war”, with devastation that would “exceed even the scope of war and cause indiscriminate suffering and destruction to mankind…contrary to the rules of international law and to the laws of humanity”. And finally, General Assembly resolution 1665 (XVI), unanimously adopted, called on nuclear and non-nuclear weapons possessors to “cooperate” to prevent further acquisition and spread of nuclear weapons. These early resolutions fed into “non-proliferation” talks between the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom, viewed as first steps towards disarmament.

4 0
3 years ago
1. which of these statements are true about sperm and egg cells?
valentinak56 [21]
B. Sperm and egg cells are made during meiosis and question 2 is B. Sperm
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The __________ of a study establishes the boundary between finding significant support and lacking enough support for a research
Nuetrik [128]
I think the most reasonable answer would be the second option, B. “Critical value”
4 0
3 years ago
What did the development of Agriculture allow the Mississippian Indians to do​
dedylja [7]

Answer:

"The Mississippian Period lasted from approximately 800 to 1540 CE. It’s called “Mississippian” because it began in the middle Mississippi River valley, between St. Louis and Vicksburg. However, there were other Mississippians as the culture spread across modern-day US. There were large Mississippian centers in Missouri, Ohio, and Oklahoma."

Explanation:

"The construction of large, truncated earthwork pyramid mounds, or platform mounds. Such mounds were usually square, rectangular, or occasionally circular. Structures (domestic houses, temples, burial buildings, or other) were usually constructed atop such mounds.

Maize-based agriculture. In most places, the development of Mississippian culture coincided with adoption of comparatively large-scale, intensive maize agriculture, which supported larger populations and craft specialization.

The adoption and use of riverine (or more rarely marine) shells as tempering agents in their shell tempered pottery.

Widespread trade networks extending as far west as the Rockies, north to the Great Lakes, south to the Gulf of Mexico, and east to the Atlantic Ocean."

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you mean by quality life?<br><br><br><br><br>​
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

The extent to which a person is healthy, comfortable, and capable of participating in or enjoying life events.

Explanation:

Hope this helps you!!! :D

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An executive act that legally excuses a convicted offender from a criminal penalty is called a pardon.
    5·1 answer
  • After learning more about what GCU is all about by reading the GCU doctrinal statement and Christian Identity and Heritage, how
    6·1 answer
  • When Greenbelt Construction Company began building houses in a large subdivision with many other builders, the company priced it
    8·1 answer
  • According to schlegel and barry (1991), how frequently do most adolescents in traditional cultures have contact with their grand
    13·1 answer
  • How to do a boycott poster
    7·1 answer
  • The place where God judged Israel by fire was:<br><br> Taberah<br> Kibroth<br> Hazeroth<br> Kadesh
    9·1 answer
  • What was it called when states were allowed to choose if they want it to be a slave state or a free state
    6·1 answer
  • 1. What is meant by soil and soil conservation? What are the different ways in which soil formation takes place?
    12·1 answer
  • Why would the Quartering Act have upset a colonist?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Atlantic slave trade begin? How did the Dutch East India Company bring the world into contact? Identify one positive
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!