All categories

4 years ago

Is 2.060060006... a irrational or rational number and please explain

Mathematics

2 answers:

DiKsa [7]4 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Irrational

Step-by-step explanation:

2.060060006... never ends, thus it is an irrational number

an irrational number is a number that can not be expressed by a fraction of two integers

you can tell it never ends because of the addition of ... at the end of the number

Olenka [21]4 years ago

5 0

The number 2.060060006... is irrational because it never ends (not necessarily meaning repeating).

The decimal doesn’t repeat the same digits over and over again, so it isn’t a repeating decimal.

It also doesn’t end, so of course it’s not terminating.

Another example of an irrational decimal is pi (π). It goes on and on but doesn’t repeat the same digits over and over again.

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in

How to solve x/-3-2=5.5

amid [387]

Okay first set up the equation

x
--- -2 = 5.5
-3

add over the 2

x
--- = 7.5
-3

now you need to multiply the denominator by the answer

(-3)(7.5) = x
-22.5 = x

3 0

4 years ago

0.5w = -7 pleasse help me

matrenka [14]

Answer:

The answer is -14.

Step-by-step explanation:

Just divide -7 by 0.5

7 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me find the annulus of the shaded area? much appreciated

Dimas [21]

Answer:

34.83

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

CAN SOMEONE HELP ME WITH QUESTION 9

Savatey [412]

Answer:

I notice that they are equal.

Step-by-step explanation:

The slopes are the same when they are on the same line

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Determine whether the fractions 3 4 and 4 5 are equivalent. Question content area bottom Part 1 Select the correct choice below

VMariaS [17]

Answer: Choice A

The fractions are not equivalent because the product of the numerator of the first fraction and the denominator of the second fraction is  15  , which is not equal to the product of the numerator of the second fraction and the denominator of the first fraction  16 

===================================================

Explanation:

We have the template $\frac{P}{Q} = \frac{R}{S}$ which cross multiplies to $PS = QR$

So if $\frac{3}{4} = \frac{4}{5}$ was true, then $3*5 = 4*4$ must be true as well, and vice versa.

The left side 3*5 turns into 15, while the right hand side 4*4 becomes 16. The 15 and 16 don't match up.

In short, $3*5 = 4*4$ turns into $15 = 16$ which is a false statement. So the original claim that $\frac{3}{4} = \frac{4}{5}$ is also false.

5 0

2 years ago