To figure out how many cards are in each deck, divide 312 by 6. That comes out to a quotient of 52. That means there are 52 cards in each deck.
#5, the way to figure out which is the better deal, is to multiply the 2 package by the 5 package (note, DO NOT multiply the prices, only how many games they hold) that comes out to 10. So, what you do know is multiply the 2 games price by 5.
$11.98 * 5 = $59.9
Do the same with the 5 package, except multiply it by 2.
$24.95 * 2 = $49.9
Now, with these 2 answers you can tell that the 5 game package is $10 cheaper than the 2 game package, even though you are getting the same amount of games.
Hope this helps a little!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: u = 9.5hrs
Alternative: u =/ 9.5hrs
Using the t test
t = x-u/sd/√n
Where x is 10hrs, u is 9.5, sd is 1.6 and n is 15
t = 10-9.5 / (1.6/√15)
t = 0.5 / (0.4131)
t = 1.21
In order to make a conclusion, we have to find the p value at a significance level lot 0.1. The p value is 0.2263 which is greater than 0.1. This, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough statistical evidence to prove that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Answer:
Carter's bedroom would cost more to carpet than Carly's because the floor area of the former is about five square feet greater than the floor area of Carly's bedroom.
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of either of these floors is found by multiplying length by width:
A = L*W.
Carly's bedroom is 15.3 ft by 8.7 ft; multiplying, we get A = 133.11 ft^2
Carter's is 14.4 ft by 9.6 ft: A = 138.24 ft^2
Carter's bedroom area (138.24 ft^2) is about 5 ft^2 larger than Carly's and would thus cost more to carpet.
Answer:
C. 12
1:3 yard to feet
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps