Answer:
Factoring fee = 2% * Account Receivable
= 2% * $3,400
= $68
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Cash $3,332
Factoring expenses $68
Account receivables $3,400
(To record the receipt of cash against the receivables)
Answer:
B) a monopolist's demand curve is the same as the market demand curve
Explanation:
The demand curve is downward sloping for both monopolies and competitive markets. Rational consumers will always buy larger quantities of products or services when their prices are lower, and inversely will buy less when the price if higher. This applies to all types of markets except monopsonies (a lot of suppliers and only one consumer).
Answer: Increase; increase
Explanation:
Efficiency is so vital to business and manufacturing. The ability of a business to produce and curb minimal loss will give a boast on production and encourage manufacturers to do more, especially when they have the ability to produce in large quantity (by batches) and still get a good ratio for the number of goods manufactured. This is where machines has aided productivity, as they were introduced, productivity increased and they were minimal loss and time waste when producing. When technology allows for more of this effective machines, manufacturers will produce more and there would be a boast in investment.
Answer:
B) Only statement II is correct.
- II. Has $20,000 of taxable income from Corporation Z.
Explanation:
One of the disadvantages of a C Corporation is that their owners (stockholders) are double taxed. That means that the corporation is taxed and then the stockholders are taxed depending on the dividends that they receive. In this case, Walter has $10,000 of taxable income from Corporation X (= $50,000 x 20%).
On the other hand, sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies and S Corporations are not taxed, they are pass through entities whose owners are taxed directly. In this case, Walter owns 20% of Corporation Z, therefore he must pay taxes on 20% of taxable income = $100,000 x 20% = $20,000.
Answer:
both Gladys and Phil
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario both Gladys and Phil are guilty of violating the Fair Housing Law. The Fair Housing law completely outlaws the refusal to sell a house or property to someone on the basis of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin. Which is exactly why Gladys and Phil removed the property and did not want to sell to the minority couple.
