The data are reported in the attached table.
We define the null hypothesis H₀ as the statement that is believed true until we prove it wrong with the test.
We define the alternative hypothesis H₁ as the statement we want to conclude with our test.
The difference in graffiti before (B) and after (A) will be:
d = A - B.
If the graffiti declined, it means that A will be smaller than B, therefore d should be negative.
Therefore we can set:
H₀ : μd ≥ 0
H₁ : μd < 0
The equal sign would mean that the number of graffiti incidents remained constant, therefore it is part of the null hypothesis.
Therefore the correct answer is B) H₀: μd ≥ 0 versus <span>H₁</span>: μd < 0
♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️



We're done now but I have something to tell...
##############################
Hint :

##############################


♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
Answer:
42.1
Explanation step-by-step:
Working out the lenght of the blue-dashed line:
SOH
47 is the Hypotenuse.
the blue line is the adjacent.
adjacent= Cos(30) x47
adjacent= 40.7
Working out x :
40.7 is the opposite this time.
x is the adjacent.
x = 40.7/ Tan(44)
x = 42.1
drawing isn't shown, pls take a screenshot or photograph the exercise
What are u asking me too do factor simplify??