All categories

3 years ago

Is it linear or not if it's not explain

Mathematics

1 answer:

riadik2000 [5.3K]3 years ago

8 0

It is linear... x is increasing by 2 and y is increasing by 7 each time

You might be interested in

Which of the following sets contains multiples of six?

Brrunno [24]

D, because it is the only one that contains multiples. All others contain factors.

If you have any doubts plz let me know.

8 0

2 years ago

Instructions

Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Some one help im so confused...

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Suppose lines EF and GH are reflected over the line Y equals X to form the lines JK and LM which statement would be true about t

katrin [286]

Answer:

A) JK and LM will be parallel to each other.

Step-by-step explanation:

On reflection on $y=x$ line the x co-ordinate changes with y co-ordinate and y co-ordinate changes with x co-ordinate

$(x,y)\rightarrow (y,x)$

Points on line EF

$(0,6) , (-5,-2)$

On reflection of this line on $y=x$ the new points we get for line JK are

$(6,0),(-2,-5)$

Points on line GH

$(-4,9),(-9,1)$

On reflection on y=x line the new points we get for line LM are

$(9,-4),(1,-9)$

Slope of line JK

$m=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x2-x1}\\m=\frac{(-5)-0}{(-2)-6} \\m=\frac{-5}{-8}=\frac{5}{8}$

Slope of line LM

$m=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x2-x1}\\m=\frac{(-9)-(-4)}{1-9} \\m=\frac{-9+4}{-8}=\frac{-5}{-8}\\m=\frac{5}{8}$

For two line to be parallel, their slopes will be same.

$m_{JK} =\frac{5}{8} , m_{LM}=\frac{5}{8}$

Since slopes of lines JK and LM are same therefore we can say that these are parallel to each other.

5 0

3 years ago

I am VERY confused on this question. Can someone help me?

Iteru [2.4K]

Answer: z=67-at
————
a-45

6 0

3 years ago

The following statement is either true (in all cases) or false (for at least one example). If false, construct a specific e

matrenka [14]

Answer:

False, counterexample below

Step-by-step explanation:

Denote the unit vectors of R^3 by $e_1=(1,0,0), e_2=(0,1,0), e_3=(0,0,1)$ . Now consider $v_1=e_1, v_2=2e_1$ and $v_3=e_3$ . We have that $v_1, v_2,v_3 \in \mathbb{R}^3$ . Also, the vector $v_3$ is not a linear combination of $v_1, v_2$ because any linear combination of these two vectors will have third coordinate zero, but v_3 has third coordinate 1 so they can't be equal.

However, the set $\{v_1, v_2,v_3\}$ is not linearly independent, because $2v_1-v_2+0v_3=0$ is a non-trivial linear combination of these vectors that equals zero.

4 0

3 years ago