People of color is more used as if someone might be mulatto, or might have colour. People of colour is more used for anyone that isn't white/in a minority group, including Asians. The both can have the same meaning, someone who haw a lot a melanin that usually isn't white, and coloured people is more someone that is not white. I hope that makes since.
The social interaction can change because when you think of the word, coloured people, that is something more associated with things like lynching, racial discrimination, slavery, The Trail of Tears, etc., this topic can make certain people uncomfortable changing the atmosphere of the conversation. If you say people of colour, it applies on a broader stand than just the races that were discriminated in America (African-Americans, Latinos,Japanese people, people from the Middle East, Native Americans, the list goes on and on and on, like, never ending...) but to a broader stance of people of colour around the world, which can be more interesting, with culture, wanting to visit, and sometimes cultural appropriation and topics like that, but still!
The concept of risk behaviour refers to a lifestyle/actions that placed people at a certain negative risk in order to get a certain positive reward. For example, some people ill try to mount climbing on an extreme terrain in order to get an adrenaline rush. Another example would be someone who opened up a new business by risking the loss of his/her entire fortune.
Yes, with our consititution we can add amendments or retract them by adding on more amendments. This is seen with prohibition where we outlawed drinking, we later added an amendment that make drinking legal once again. Another example is in our consitituiton we limited African American worth to 3/5 and later this was abolished. The founding fathers knew that what was the norm in 1776 would not be the norm in 2019 so they allow changes to the document.
By conducting several experiments, we can measure the relationship between illness and stress. If we do experiments on a group of people that takes too much stress we can find out if illness will occur or not. The conclusion of the results was that illness occur when the people takes too much stress. They experience both mental as well as physical health problems.
No, because her situation does not meet all the elements necessary to recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress
Explanation:
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS can be defined as the way in which a person may begin to have severe emotional distress which was caused by another person due to the that fact that the person either intentionally or recklessly inflicted it by behaving in an highly unpleasant emotional reaction which inturn leads to a non-physical and mainly psychological injury to the affected person which was why Mary cannot recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress because her situation does not meet all the elements necessary to recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress.
In education, least restrictive environment is a learning environment which do not follow the traditional standard that follows 'one form fits all' methods of teaching.
In this environment, The educators will design their teaching method specifically to cater a special type of students along with adding some additional resources to improve the students' learning process.
This type of environment often introduced to the students with some sort of disabilities. (just like Kirk's cerebral palsy) . But the main goal of the curriculum is still to make the children with disabilities able to compete with all students during a standardized test.
