Answer:
<u>A) If it weren’t for Francis Pizarro’s, the Inca Empire would have continued to expand and prosper.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Consider, for example, we are told at the outset, <em>"When Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro landed in Peru in 1532, he found unimaginable riches. The Inca Empire was in full bloom." </em>
However, we were told that Pizarro captured and requested ransom from the last Inca emperor Atahualpa. What was the outcome? The text tells us, "Once Pizarro had executed the last emperor, the empire rapidly collapsed." This detail brings out the central idea of the text, that is, "If it weren’t for Francis Pizarro’s, the Inca Empire would have continued to expand and prosper."
Defendant is who the case is being brought out against in both civil and criminal law.
prosecutor is only criminal, plaintiff and out of court settlement is only civil
Answer:
the use of poison gas and machine guns
Explanation:
Aerial attacks weren't really a thing, unrestricted submarine warfare was a reason why the US joined the war but not a factor in high casualty rates, and blimps using direct artillery fire isnt as practical as machine guns and poison gas
There are two major causes: Germanic tribes moving into the Western roman Empire until its fall by Odacer in 476 A.D.. On the other hand, emperor Constantine I had chosen Byzantium, and ancient greek site, as the "New Rome", which would become Constantinople. Constantine I established Christianity as the official religion for the empire.The eastern half of the roman empire survived more than 1000 years, because of strategic location as a trading center and connection between Europe and Asia.
