Answer:
Yes, I believe they would.
Explanation:
Bolts of Silk was considered a luxurious goods during that time period. It mostly sold toward nobles with a really high price.
That's being said, the Han officials main interest during their reign was not economic growth. They wanted to acquire the territories of other empires that were located in Central Asia. In order to do this, they initiated several war campaigns throughout that region.
For war campaigns, horses are far more valuable than silk. They can be used as cavalries or methods of transportation to deliver supplies for their soldiers. This was the reason why they would probably be content with that exchange.
I would say D. Most consumers didn't stay away from the company
because if your trying to boycott something then you are protesting against that company and you are not using whatever that company has, so if the consumers didn't stay away then they would still use and be around the company and that is not the purpose of boycotting
Hope this helps!! :D
I believe the answer is: Judge
Even though juries have the power to determine whether a defendant is guilty or not, they do not have a final decision in determining duration of prison stay.
That power (along with the power to maintain order during the trial) fall at the hands of the judges.
The correct answer is letter C
the answer for this is false
