Answer:
<u>Limited governments</u> have legal restrictions imposed on their powers. Examples of these governments include the United Kingdom and <u>Germany.</u> The citizens of these countries enjoy <u>basic</u> rights such as freedom of speech and the press. However, <u>unconfined governments</u> don’t face any legal restrictions on their powers. As a result, the citizens of these governments often experience human rights violations.
Answer:
well, the correct first act would be to file a noise complaint, but for the answers given, I would choose D.
Explanation:
A. to sue bates for money damages would be not smart as there is no evidence that he did any damages. he's just using a noisy lawn mower.
B. Bates did not commit a crime as far as we know. unless they have filed multiple complaints, this is just a simple agitating thinghe's doing.
C. to present a signed petition seems a little far-fetched. I belive this would be the correct thing to do if this continues. but the amount of time it would take to get all of the votes it wouldn't even be worth it at the end.
with all of those rolled out, the best answer Is D.
please make me brainliest.
Answer:
In short, staying calm helps the experience pass quicker.
Explanation:
Hello there, thank you for the question! ^w^
The correct answer would be true!
"Why did we ban retroactive criminal laws? Because they undermine the "central values" of free societies. To allow this would threated the rule of law itself, it would become a rule of officials instead."
Have a great day! <3
Answer: Confidentiality / Non-Disclosure agreements
Explanation:
We've all watched movies where people discuss very secretive things over the phone or with another person while they are being driven and at some point we wonder why those discussing are not worried about the driver spilling the beans.
The reason is because these high-profile clients need to protect their privacy and so make sure that those working for them especially their security agents, sign Non-Disclosure or Confidentiality agreements that require them not to speak of the things they hear or see about their clients.
Should they breach this agreement, they will be in a wealth of legal problems as well as suffer reputational loss. Sometimes though this does not seem to work and they still breach the agreement. It is a good deterrent either way.
