I think that this question was asked by a bot made by brainly.
Answer:
It provided a way to check the powers of congress and president. Before this ruling, there was no checks and balances.
Explanation:
The 1803 Supreme court case of Marbury v. Madison was an important decision that helped shape the way the powers of the state, as well as the federal government, are dealt with. This event established the case for a judicial review, thereby bringing it for the very first time in the history of the US Supreme Court.
With the case involving the powers of the outgoing and incoming presidents, and the validity of the state and federal powers, the decision laid the groundwork for how the powers of the Congress and the president are limited to. This brings forth the legality of the federal courts to declare any legislation unconstitutional, bringing the step to check exercise of powers. Before this, there had never been checks or balances for the powers of the federal sector.
Answer:B. complicated by the fact that the future is uncertain.
Explanation:
The economy of the state changes every now and then eventhough we want to sustain our future but we are never sure if these investments would truly sustain us or they may go down if the economy crashes .
We don't know if those companies where we do our investments will last until the future where we can get our money and be able to use it.
Anything can change in the future and affect the overall status of our Investments.
A monarchy is a government that would share the characteristic of being ruled by a single leader.
