Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. 5
2. -9
3. -4
4. 4 > .25
5. 0.142 < 7
6. -8 = -8
Sum/difference:
Let
This means that
Now, assume that 
is rational. The sum/difference of two rational numbers is still rational (so 5-x is rational), and the division by 3 doesn't change this. So, you have that the square root of 8 equals a rational number, which is false. The mistake must have been supposing that was rational, which proves that the sum/difference of the two given terms was irrational
Multiplication/division:
The logic is actually the same: if we multiply the two terms we get
if again we assume x to be rational, we have
But if x is rational, so is -x/15, and again we come to a contradiction: we have the square root of 8 on one side, which is irrational, and -x/15 on the other, which is rational. So, again, x must have been irrational. You can prove the same claim for the division in a totally similar fashion.
Answer:
amt. the shop spends on 40 pairs
= $11 × 40
= $440
amt. paid extra (due to fixed cost) per pair
= ($450 - $440) ÷ 40
= $0.25
amt. per pair to break even
= $11 + $0.25
= $11.25
The amount of money he will be able to withdraw after 10 years after his last deposit is $926,400.
<h3>Compound interest</h3>
- Principal, P = $2,000 × 12 × 4
= $96,000
- Time, t = 10 years
- Interest rate, r = 24% = 0.24
- Number of periods, n = 2
A = P(1 + r/n)^nt
= $96,000( 1 + 0.24/2)^(2×10)
= 96,000 (1 + 0.12)^20
= 96,000(1.12)^20
= 96,000(9.65)
= $926,400
Therefore, the amount of money he will be able to withdraw after 10 years after his last deposit is $926,400
Learn more about compound interest:
brainly.com/question/24924853
#SPJ4
Answer: if you mean 2/1 the answer would be 4/2, 6/3 and 8/4 if you mean 1/2 the answer would be 2/4,3/6 and 4/8 good luck!
Step-by-step explanation:
