Answer:
$84,000
Explanation:
The computation of August cash disbursement for manufacturing overhead is seen below;
Direct labor hour
5,600
Variable overhead per hour
$5.4
Variable manufacturing overhead
$30,240
Fixed manufacturing overhead
$69,440
Total manufacturing overhead
$99,680
Less: Depreciation
$15,680
Cash disbursement for manufacturing overhead
$84,000
The original data is :
Data for Hermann Corporation
Per unit Percent of sales
Selling price $ 75 100%
Variable expenses 51 68
Contribution margin $ 24 32%
The fixed expenses are $ 75,000 per month and the company is selling 4000 units per month.
Solution :
Present Proposed
Sales 300000 375000
Less : Variable cost 204000 275000
Contribution margin 96000 100000
Less : Fixed expenses <u> 75000 </u> <u> 75000 </u>
Net income 21000 25000
The net operating income : Increases 4000
Net operating income = increased sales Net income - current sales net income.
Therefore the higher quality component should be used.
Answer:
VF= $143.801,78
Explanation:
Dada la siguiente información:
Deposito mensual (A)= $2.500
Cantidad de periodos (n)= 4*12= 48 meses
Interes mensual (i)= 0,09/12= 0,0075
<u>Para calcular el valor futuro (VF), debemos usar la siguiente formula:</u>
VF= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
VF= {2.500*[(1,0075^48) - 1]} / 0,0075
VF= $143.801,78
Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
That would be government regulations because the government always ensures consumers safety.
