Answer:
I have no clue what the answer is, more context please
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
280,000
Step-by-step explanation:
10^5=100,000
2.8 x 100,000=280,000
Answer:
Step 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
B) There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude the proportion of work time linguists study a new language is more than 10%.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
the null hypothesis is;

the alternative hypothesis is:

The p - value for the hypothesis is 0.09
The level of significance ∝ = 0.025
The Decision rule is that to reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than the level of significance ∝.
Conclusion: We fail to reject the null hypothesis because the p-value is greater than the level of significance , therefore:
There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude the proportion of work time linguists study a new language is more than 10%.