1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shkiper50 [21]
2 years ago
9

What is the solution to the system? 1/2x + 3/2= -7 -3x + 2y = -2

Mathematics
2 answers:
inna [77]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

y = -53/2, x = -17

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2x + 3/2 = -7

-3x +2y = -2

Isolate X for 1/2x + 3/2 = -7

X = -17

Substitute X = -17

-3(-17) + 2y = -2

Isolate Y for -3 (-17) + 2y = -2

Y = -53/2

Diano4ka-milaya [45]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

x>10

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2*x-3-(2)>0

Step by step solution :

Step 1 :

1

Simplify —

2

Equation at the end of step 1 :

1

((— • x) - 3) - 2 > 0

2

Step 2 :

Rewriting the whole as an Equivalent Fraction :

2.1 Subtracting a whole from a fraction

Rewrite the whole as a fraction using 2 as the denominator :

3 3 • 2

3 = — = —————

1 2

Equivalent fraction : The fraction thus generated looks different but has the same value as the whole

Common denominator : The equivalent fraction and the other fraction involved in the calculation share the same denominator

Adding fractions that have a common denominator :

2.2 Adding up the two equivalent fractions

Add the two equivalent fractions which now have a common denominator

Combine the numerators together, put the sum or difference over the common denominator then reduce to lowest terms if possible:

x - (3 • 2) x - 6

——————————— = —————

2 2

Equation at the end of step 2 :

(x - 6)

——————— - 2 > 0

2

Step 3 :

Rewriting the whole as an Equivalent Fraction :

3.1 Subtracting a whole from a fraction

Rewrite the whole as a fraction using 2 as the denominator :

2 2 • 2

2 = — = —————

1 2

Adding fractions that have a common denominator :

3.2 Adding up the two equivalent fractions

(x-6) - (2 • 2) x - 10

——————————————— = ——————

2 2

Equation at the end of step 3 :

x - 10

—————— > 0

2

Step 4 :

4.1 Multiply both sides by 2

Solve Basic Inequality :

4.2 Add 10 to both sides

x > 10

You might be interested in
Help plz due today i dont want to fail!
4vir4ik [10]
I believe it’s 1/2 hope it helps
4 0
2 years ago
Is an imaginary "line" from the Earth to the Moon a line, a ray, or a segment? and WHY?
sesenic [268]

Answer:

Segment

Step-by-step explanation:

It is a segment because it has two endpoints (the Earth and Moon). If it was a ray, it would go on forever in one direction. It doesn't, so the imaginary line is a segment.  

The first image is a segment, the second is a ray.

Hope this helps. :)

7 0
3 years ago
Can you helo please !!!!
Maurinko [17]

The answer for your question is B

4 0
3 years ago
An account earns simple interest. $1675 at 4.6% for 4 years a. Find the interest earned. $___ b. Find the balance of the account
Colt1911 [192]
A. First, divide 1675 by 100 to find 1% of it. 
1675 / 100 = 16.75 
Then, multiply 16.75 by 4.6 to get 4.6%. 
16.75 x 4.6 = 77.05 
77.05 is the interest for one year. 
Multiply it by 4 to get the interest for 4 years. 
77.05 x 4 = 308.20 
The interest earned is $308.20. 

B. Add the interest to the original balance to get the total. 
308.20 + 1675 = 1983.20 
The balance of the account is $1983.20 after 4 years. 

Hope this help!
7 0
3 years ago
Moose Drool Makes Grass More Appetizing Different species can interact in interesting ways. One type of grass produces the toxin
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

1)

The variable of interest is

X: level of toxin ergovaline on the grass after being treated with Moose saliva.

>The parameter of interest is the population mean of the level of ergovaline on grass after being treated with Moose saliva: μ

The best point estimate for the population mean is the sample mean:

>X[bar]=0.183 Sample average level of ergovaline on the grass after being treated with Moose saliva.

Assuming that the sample comes from a normal population.

>There is no information about the sample size takes to study the effects of the Moose saliva in the grass. Let's say that they worked with a sample of n=20

Using the Student-t you can calculate the CI as:

X[bar] ± t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2} * \frac{S}{\sqrt{n} }

Where   t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2}= t_{19;0.975}= 2.093

0.183 ± 2.093 * (0.016/√20)

[0.175;0.190]

Using a 95% confidence level you'd expect that the interval [0.175;0.190] will contain the true average of ergovaline level of grass after being treated with Moose saliva.

2)

The information of a study that shows how much does the consumption of canned soup increase urinary BPA concentration is:

Consumption of canned soup for over 5 days increases the urinary BPA more than 1000%

75 individuals consumed soup for five days (either canned or fresh)

The study reports that a 95% confidence interval for the difference in means (canned minus fresh) is 19.6 to 25.5 μg/L.

>This experiment is a randomized comparative experiment.

Out of the 75 participants, some randomly eat canned soup and some randomly eaten fresh soup conforming to two separate and independent groups that were later compared.

>The parameter of interest is the difference between the population mean of urinary BPA concentration of people who ate canned soup for more than 5 days and the population mean of urinary BPA concentration of people that ate fresh soup for more than 5 days.

>Using a 95% confidence level you'd expect that the interval 19.6 to 25.5 μg/L would contain the value of the difference between the population mean of urinary BPA concentration of people who ate canned soup for more than 5 days and the population mean of urinary BPA concentration of people that ate fresh soup for more than 5 days.

> If the sample had been larger, then you'd expect a narrower CI, the relationship between the amplitude of the CI and sample size is indirect. Meaning that the larger the sample, the more accurate the estimation per CI is.

3)

> The parameter of interest is Average Long-Term Weight Gain Overeating for just four weeks can increase fat mass and weight over two years later of people with an average age of 26 years old.

> The only way of finding the true value of the parameter is if you were to use the information of the whole population of interest, this is making all swedes with an average age of 26 increase calorie intake by 70% (mostly by eating fast food) and limit their daily activity to a maximum of 5000 steps per day and then measure their weight gain over two years. since this es virtually impossible to do, due to expenses and size of the population, is that the estimation with a small but representative sample is conducted.

>

n= 18

X[bar]= 6.8 lbs

S= 1.2

X[bar] ± t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2} * (S/√n)

6.8 ± 2.101 * (1.2/√18)

t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2}= t_{17;0.975}= 2.101

[6.206;7.394]

With a 95% confidence level, you'd expect that the interval [6.206;7.394] will contain the true value of the Average Long-Term Weight Gain Overeating for just four weeks can increase fat mass and weight over two years later of people with an average age of 26 years old.

>

The margin of error of the interval is

t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2} * (S/√n)= 2.101 * (1.2/√18)= 0.59

With a 95% it is expected that the true value of the Average Long-Term Weight Gain Overeating for just four weeks can increase fat mass and weight over two years later of people with an average age of 26 years old. will be 0.59lbs away from the sample mean.

I hope it helps

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How are percents,fractions,and decimals related
    15·2 answers
  • 40 points Please help, answer and explain, please. Thank you!
    13·1 answer
  • In rectangle ABCD with side AD = 6 cm, point M is the midpoint of side
    14·1 answer
  • In the context of a correlational study, what does the positive or negative sign of a correlation coefficient indicate?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the value of cos H?
    10·1 answer
  • Write the product(2+7i)(2-7i) in the form a+bi
    11·1 answer
  • How Many Squares does the Below given picture. <br> Thanks.
    12·1 answer
  • Please need help thank
    15·1 answer
  • 5m + 26 - 3p when m = 3 and p = 4
    10·1 answer
  • Alan rode his bike for 5 1/5 hours during one week. That same week, Brook rode her bike for 6 1/8 hours. How many more hours did
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!