1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
azamat
3 years ago
12

Compare the goals of radical republicans, freedpeople, and ex-confederates during reconstruction. what conflicts ensued from the

ir differing agendas?
Social Studies
1 answer:
noname [10]3 years ago
6 0
Goals of the radical Republicans : Require harsher punishments for the southern citizens due to their effort in extending slavery
Goals of Freed people: Only obtain the same rights just like other citizens have.
Goals of Ex-Confederates: To restore the south into its former Glory where it became the center of nation's economy.
The conflicts rely on the fact that many southern citizens still create some effort to disobey the reconstruction regulations even after they lost the civil war.
You might be interested in
What were the goals of the colonists new spain
Ilya [14]
Their goal was to extract gold and silver from the Americans, to stimulate the Spanish economy and make Spain a more powerful country.
6 0
3 years ago
Discuss three (3) typologies of followers.
storchak [24]

Answer:

Isolates

Isolates are completely detached. They don't care about their leaders, know anything about them or respond to them in any obvious way. Their alienation is, nevertheless, of consequence. By default – by knowing nothing and doing nothing – isolates strengthen leaders who already have the upper hand.

Bystanders

Bystanders observe but do not participate. They make a deliberate decision to stand aside, disengaging from their leaders and the group. This withdrawal is, in effect, a declaration of neutrality that amounts to tacit support for the status quo.

Participants

Participants are in some way engaged. They clearly favor or oppose their leaders and the groups and organizations of which they are a part. In either case, they care enough to invest some of what they have (time, for example) to have an impact.

Activists

Activists feel strongly about their leaders, and they act accordingly. They are eager, energetic and engaged. Because they are heavily invested in people and process, they work hard on behalf of their leaders or to undermine and even unseat them.

Diehards

Diehards are prepared to die for their cause, whether that is an individual, an idea or both. Diehards are deeply devoted to their leaders or, in contrast, ready to remove them from positions of power, authority and influence by any means necessary. Diehards are defined by their dedication, including their willingness to risk life and limb. Being a diehard is all-consuming. It is who you are. It determines what you do.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Ethics seeks an account of how and why people should act a certain way, rather than how they do act. this nature of ethics makes
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
<span>ethics seeks an account of how and why people should act a certain way, rather than how they do act. this nature of ethics makes it a(n) normative discipline.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Pavlov's dog learned to anticipate food whenever he was presented with stimuli associated with food. pavlov knew that his dog as
alexandr1967 [171]
<span>Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov originated the study of classical conditioning while studying the salivation of dogs and finding that they would begin salivating even when they were not supposed to. Pavlov's classic experiment consisted of his paring of the ticking sound of a metronome with the presentation of food to see if the dogs would eventually salivate to just the sound of the ticking metronome.

</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Differentiate between fair descrimination and unfair discrimination,and also use relevent examples​
serg [7]

Answer:

Fair discrimination- Discrimination means treating some people differently from others. It isn't always unlawful - after all, people are paid different wages depending on their status and skills. However, there are certain reasons for which your employer can't discriminate against you by law. Discrimination happens when an employer treats one employee less favourably than others. It could mean a female employee being paid less than a male colleague for doing the same job, or an employee from a minority ethnic community being refused the training opportunities offered to other colleagues.

There are specific laws against some types of discrimination (called 'unlawful discrimination'). If your employer treats you less favourably for an unlawful reason, you may be able to take action. If your employer treats you unfairly for any other reason, this is not unlawful discrimination.

There are laws against discrimination on the basis of your:

-gender

-marriage or civil partnership

-gender reassignment

-pregnancy and maternity leave

-sexual orientation

-disability

-race

-colour

-ethnic background

-nationality

-religion or political opinion

-age

Unfair discrimination- Unfair discrimination is when you are treated differently as compared to other categories of people and that your dignity as a human being is impaired by such treatment.

Discrimination is regarded as unfair when it imposes burdens or withholds benefits or opportunities from any person on one of the prohibited grounds listed in the Act, namely: race, gender, sex, pregnancy, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth etc.

It is important to note that the Act does not prohibit discrimination but unfair discrimination.There are certain circumstances where discrimination can be regarded as fair e.g. measures designed to advance persons disadvantaged by the previous system of racial discrimination.

Cases for fair discrimination (read case)- The new amendments to the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (the EEA) assist employers in defending unfair discrimination claims by enabling employers to show that the alleged unfair discrimination is justifiable. Prior to the amendment, an employer was only able to escape liability by showing that the discrimination in question was fair.

Hope it helps!!!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Assume that the required reserve ratio is 88 percent. What is the total possible expansion of the money supply after a $400,000
    12·1 answer
  • Proponemos un proyecto participativo de voluntariado para poblaciones en condiciones de vulnerabilidad
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following amendments to the U.S. Constitution reflects the principle of federalism?
    13·1 answer
  • Which characteristics of a constitutional government do you think are most important? Why?
    6·1 answer
  • Why were people of color not allowed to hold the priesthood in the mormon church?
    9·1 answer
  • Should America let the Caravan into America or not?<br> Why or why not?
    9·1 answer
  • Mass or congregational worship is normally organised in the house. True or False​
    8·1 answer
  • Did colombus or cartier explore St. Lawrence River?
    13·2 answers
  • So we not gonna talk about the ball rolling down the sidewalk
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the maya achievements illustrates knowledge of astronomy
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!