The Indian independence movement eventually led to

Social Studies

2 answers:

Aneli [31]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

Mohandas Gandhi fought for independence of India so When the british became tired of him they asked him what he wants from the and he said that he wants them to leave india and India itself had a lot of resorces, so because of this they british lost another war and the territory of the british declined.

serg [7]3 years ago

4 0

Yep, it's definitely C.

It's a matter of process of elimination, and just facts. Nobody exiled Mohandas Gandhi because he played a key role in the independence of India from the British Empire! The Cold War did not occur during this era, and the Indian independence movement had literally nothing to do with the American Civil Rights Movement.

You might be interested in

One characteristic of good listeners is that they _____.

Viktor [21]

<span>are empathetic A good listen would put him or self in the position of the person talking. And most importantly would connect emotionally to share the feelings and the pain of the person he or she is listening to. A good listen would would not imagine himself talking to someone and the person is not paying attention and as such they would not want to do to someone what they cannot imagine that someone would do to them and as such they listen and respond accordingly.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

Please help.

zimovet [89]

Answer: C

Explanation:

Though the North would eventually outlaw slavery, they did benefit from it for a time. The civil war was about more than slavery. The south had a prospering economy because of cotton exports that were earned off the backs of slaves. The north, wanting a piece of that action asked the southerners for more taxes on exports. The south refused. So the north did it anyways, the south pulls out of the union, so the north says "If you wont give us taxes, we will free your workforce..." Or something along those lines. The north is often portrayed as heroes to the slaves, but really, they just wanted money. If you research how slaves who escaped to the north and fought for the union were treated, you will see that the north wasn't a bunch of choir boys.

7 0

2 years ago

What is judicial review?

Setler [38]

Judicial Review is the Court's Examination of the Constitutionality of the actions of Congress and the President (and the court's right to nullify what the other branches of government have done if they find it unconstitutional). This process was first established by the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Case.

7 0

2 years ago

HELP PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE

Vanyuwa [196]

ok, what is the question?

6 0

3 years ago

Write an article on the topic "Nepal<br>crisis and its solution in Nepal."

Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:

Nepal has huge natural potentials like many rivers running down from the Himalayas in high speed, nearly all-year long sunshine, making it an ideal place to utilize hydro- and solar power. But what Nepal lacks is expertise. So to utilize the potentials, Nepal has to employ Indian, Chinese and other experts and even companies. Due to not too transparent system and changing governments with differing decisions, foreign investment is not effective in Nepal. Projects are started, then stopped half the way…

There is also a kind of unbased “paranoia” when foreign companies offer help (in exchange for business opportunities) in these projects. This fear is based on outdated superstitions and xenophobia towards Indians or Western companie and charities (they might try to secretly overtake the land?). This era is but not an era of colonization anymore, history had changed. Also, in spite of the wide belief, most Western charities are not wishing to convert Nepalis to Christianity in exchange for offering help in any technical expertize, as the majority of the West now is secular and not Christian.

In my modest opinion, Nepali governments should lessen the fear from foreign investors and allow some of them to make a real change, even if it seems financially less beneficial in a short -term for the country. Nepali decision-makers should understand the long-term benefits of enabling foreign investments in a development of the whole country, infrastructure, life standard of Nepalis.

Next: the education system of Nepal is painfully outdated. If Nepal cared more about “brain-exchange” programs, cooperation between Nepali and Western universities, sooner or later Nepal could grow its own engineering experts. The talents are there, but they have no opportunities. Also, why should a developing country charge high fees for study at universities? This is blocking the development of Nepal. If higher study was free in Nepal as it is in Europe, in a single generation many energy experts would appear and Nepal would look like Europe!

Thus the problem is not real, but “psychological”. The resources are there, but the mentality is backward and everyone wants a piece of the cake for himself. For real changes human beings must learn to sacrifice, and this counts also for governments and politicians. First there is a need to change the way of thinking, and the development will come after it like its tail

7 0

3 years ago