1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DiKsa [7]
3 years ago
12

compare and contrast the different plans for Reconstruction and make a claim as to which plan was better to meet the Reconstruct

ion goals.
History
1 answer:
bezimeni [28]3 years ago
7 0
You talking about the reconstruction era?
You might be interested in
Who won the race of the transcontinental railroad?
lilavasa [31]
The Union Pacific won.  

Ideally America won.  Fulfilled Lincoln's dream, unifying our country with a common goal.  Helping us heal after the Civil War.   
7 0
3 years ago
What three basic principles did other governments adopt from the Magna Carta
mario62 [17]

Answer: Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial.

Explanation:

hope this helps, have a great day!

4 0
2 years ago
In a brief to the Supreme Court of Oregon, you cite the 1985 Supreme Court of Washington case Larry Daugert, Trustee for David M
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Regarding the case of Daugert vs. Pappas; the Supreme Court must be informed that John Pappas and his firm were found guilty of malpractice, due to extra temporal request to review an appeal, on a case that was previously ruled in favor of his former client.  His negligence conducted to his former client to assume costs, previously overruled by the Court.   Main considerations for this case evaluation were the chances of the appeal reversion, as estimated by the Jury

Explanation:

Background

The attorney John Pappas was working for <em>Mountain Development Company (MDC)</em>.  <em>Black Mountain Ranch (BMR)</em>, a commercial entity, bought a recreation complex from MDC.  <u>Several deficiencies appeared in the construction</u> and both parties tried to resolved who should be in charge of repairing costs, without agreement.  

As a solution, both proposed an agreement, with an external advisor evaluating the situation (Anvil Corporation).  When Anvil concluded its investigation, indicated that <u>all defects were caused by a faulty design made by MDC</u>.  MDC then rejected those findings, and also, refused to pay for the corrections.  To this, BMR responded with a lawsuit against MDC, indicating an agreement breach.

At the end of trial, the Court assigned the blame not to MDC, but BMR, <u>pointing that lack of maintenance </u>resulted in degradation of the infrastructure.  BMR then filed an appeal, indicating that, since there was no wrong intention proved, <u>the agreement was biding.  </u>

MDC asked its attorney, <em>John Pappas</em>, to request a review to the Court; but <u>this request was presented a day after finishing the valid period to receive the request.</u>  Considering this, the developer lost any chance of defending themselves against the appeal, and <em>the Court failed in favor of BMR.  </em>

Summarizing, the lawsuit that initially was provided by Court in favor of MCD, was later lost because their attorney did not requested a review, in the given time.  

As consequence, MCD, represented by Larry Daugert, presented a suit against Pappas, alleging malpractice.  

Daugert vs. Pappas.

Pappas and his firm were accused by Daugert of<em> breach of duty,</em> causing MDC to lost a case that was ruled in their favor, due to an extra temporal appeal review request.

During trial, <u>allegations were made based on the chances of dismissal of the appeal if the review request would have been accepted.</u>  Judge considered this an issue <em>to be ruled by Jury,</em> indicating them that:

  1. There could be a chance that the malpractice from Pappas affected the final outcome against MDC.
  2. The chance of the Supreme Court to accept the review and reversed the appeal outcome.
  3. The percentage of avoiding damage lost by MDC due to Pappas malpractice.  

Finally, the Jury calculated in 20% the changes of the Supreme Court to review and reverse the appeal, meaning that Daugert was able to prove malpractice performed by Pappas.  

Main elements resulting of this trial

The main element used to rule malpractice is <u>how close are the actions </u>of the professional to create a negative result for its customer (proximity cause).  On this case, the attorney failed to present a review in time, affecting his customer.  This is the main justification provided to fail against Pappas, and used to define malpractice.  

<u>Also, considering that requesting the Jury to provide probabilities of the scenarios</u> indicated by the Judge could have been considered out of rule, this was made in base of the client’s needs, and the legal profession.  This, in order to provide a perspective of this proximity cause, for the Jury.

4 0
3 years ago
Consider the political world of America. Today senators do not kill one another physically, but what kinds of tricks do they pla
Solnce55 [7]

The correct answer is; They slander each other.

Further Explanation:

In today's society, senators may not kill each other but they can harm each others careers. They will go to great lengths to find and air the others "dirty laundry" during an election year. They will slander the other senator and then hope the the citizens will turn on him/her.

They can do this through newscasts, magazine and newspaper interviews, and when they are on political tour. During speeches they will tell how the other person running or the current senator has voted on things that has hurt the government or even talk about how they cheated on their spouse.

Learn more about elections at brainly.com/question/13579852

#LearnwithBrainly

6 0
3 years ago
Why does the author state that a little rebellion is a good thing
Anika [276]
Is it an essay answer or are their option to chose from?
I need something to work off of
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This type of economy is also known as capitalism.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the proposition that Benjamin Franklin suggested at the Albany Congress of 1754?
    8·1 answer
  • George felt his heart beating faster. Could this be the chance he was looking for—the answer to the questions he didn’t even kno
    13·2 answers
  • What caused homo sapiens to migrate across the globe?
    8·1 answer
  • Describle England before the 1530s and after 1535.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the term of office for supreme court justices? when can they be removed?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did living conditions for southerners—black and white—change after 1820?
    8·2 answers
  • Which natural wonders are volcanic, or formed by volcanic activity? Choose two correct answers.
    5·1 answer
  • Who does this editorial say is responsible for the Maine’s loss?
    8·2 answers
  • Do you think we should continue to use Helium to fill up balloons, like in
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!