Answer:
<em>1</em><em>. </em><em>Economies of scale.</em>
<em>2</em><em>. </em><em>Capital requirements</em><em>.</em>
<em>3</em><em>. </em><em>Product differentiation. </em>
Based on the scenario above, Janet can be regarded as an Free-rein learder. Janet has the authority style where subordinates are not straightforwardly managed and rather should work on possess and demonstrate their value through achievements. No particular supervisory criteria must be met.
Answer:
Yes the company must recognise the effects of this ruling.
Explanation:
As provided the law suit was initiated in the year 20x2, because of the activity happened in April 20x2.
Accordingly, company was already prepared for a liability of $100,000.
Whenever an event that occurs after the balance sheet is a mere confirmation to what was expected on balance sheet date, or is in alignment with things on record on the balance sheet date, it shall be provided in the balance sheet of that year.
In the given case the law suit was pending on the balance sheet date and was recorded as a liability then, now after the declaration by the judge, the additional liability of $20,000 shall be provided in the financial books of year 20x2.
Answer:
Market value of stock A = 20 shares x $10 = $200
Market value of stock B = 15 shares x $3 = $45
Market value of stock C = 10 shares x $5 = $50
Total market value $295
Amount to invest in stock A
= $200/$295 x $5,000
= $3,389.83
Explanation:
In this case, we will calculate the market value of each stock by multiplying the number of each stock by their corresponding market prices.
Thereafter, we will divide the market value of stock A by the total market value multiplied by amount available for investment ($5,000).
After crime scene is cleared with all finger prints taken.
