"They reduce disposable income" explains how contractionary policies can hamper economic growth
<h3>Further explanation
</h3>
Disposable income is the amount of money that households have,available for spending and saving after income taxes accounted.
Expansionary fiscal policy is an increase in government expenditures, also a decrease in taxes that causes the government's budget deficit to increase or its budget surplus to decrease. In short, expansionary fiscal policy boosts economic growth by lowering interest rates.
Whereas contractionary fiscal policy is defined as a decrease in government expenditures, also an increase in taxes that causes the government's budget deficit to decrease or its budget surplus to increase. Contractionary money policy is used to combat inflation. In short, contractionary fiscal policy hamper economic growth by increasing interest rates.
Contractionary policy increases the cost of borrowing. It can decreases GDP and dampens inflation, but also leads to reduced disposable income. Another negative side effect is it makes an increase in the unemployment rate. Disposable income itself is the amount of money that households have, available for spending and saving after income taxes accounted.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about hamper economic growth brainly.com/question/11698157
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject: social studies
Chapter: hamper economic growth
Keywords: hamper economic growth
Answer:
The States were less centralized, the federal government of the states had less power, meaning it was harder to get all the states on the same page as opposed to the United States where all the states are free but still have to answer and comply with overall federal government.
Explanation:
Answer:
A mini fridge, portable charger, shoes, pieces of jewelry, socks, airpods
Explanation:
Answer:
Conflict.
Explanation:
In a conflict sociological perspective, to effectively understand social behaviors between competing groups, it is best to view them in terms of tension between the groups.
A role conflict can be defined as a situation in which an individual experience competing, contradictory and perhaps incompatible demands (expectations) from two or more groups.
Simply stated, role conflict arises due to incompatible and contradictory expectations bestowed on an individual due to the position they hold
In this scenario, Fernando's position as mayor of a city requires him to satisfy his wealthy sponsors as well as many middle-class workers. The tension he feels between these two demands is referred to as role conflict.
Im not real sure about the pros, but cons include: a presidential candidate can when the election even if they lose the popular vote, and states have less representation if they have smaller populations <span />
