Answer:
The answer to this question: In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court invoked which provisions of the Constitution, would be: the necessary and proper clause and the supremacy clause.
Explanation:
The McCulloch vs. Maryland case, as a response to the financial crisis of 1819, established two landmarks, when the Supreme Court ruled first, that the state of Maryland did not have the power to tax the National Bank, as it was a federal institution, and therefore, the state did not have the power to interfere in a federal institution, especially when it came to taxing, and second, that the power of the federal government and its institutions superseded those of states. In this instance two provisions were invoked from the Constitution: The Necessary and Proper Clause and the Supremacy Clause, which curtail the rights of states to impose taxes on federal institutions, and also, that establish that the federal government reigns supreme over states.
The correct answer is d. Hamartia. The <span>term that refers to a character’s tragic flaw is Hamartia. </span>Hamartia comes from Greek "to err" and it refers to a mistake that a character does that will eventually lead to their tragedy or demise.
Answer:
Channeling
Explanation:
Channeling: The term channeling is described as a "phrase psychics" that is being used to determine the phenomenon of creating an open channel related to communication between an individual as a medium and therefore someone else is who he or she is trying to channel or channeling.
When a person tries to channel someone then he or she is allowing the other person to communicate via a "psychic connection or association" or else to receive a specific message in the given manner.
In the question above, the given aspect represents the channeling.
Here's my thought and hopefully its right, False
The Block Billionaires from buying elections act is unconstitutional because it restricts the right to freedom of expression.
The right to freedom of expression is a right that guarantees people to express themselves through:
- Ideas
- Thoughts
- Words
- Images
- Symbols
- Events
In a political campaign, candidates express through advertising and their campaigns the idea that they are the best option for the voters. Therefore, they are making use of their right to free expression.
If the court endorses this law that restricts candidates to use more than $999,999 in their political campaigns, it would be limiting the right to free expression because at that time the candidate expresses himself through his campaign.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/10673570
