Answer:
$5572500
Explanation:
consolidated cost of goods sold for 2020 would be:
consolidated cost of goods sold = ( total of goods sold by bought company ) - ( intra-entity transfer ) + ( ending unrealized gross profit ) - ( beginning unrealized gross profit )
= ( 5400000 + 1200000 ) - ( 1000000 )+(1000000*20%)*20% - {(650000*15%)*(450000/650000)}
= 6600000 - 1040000 - ( 97500 * 45/65 )
= $5572500
Answer:
a. sales figures
Explanation:
In the case when the design would be made with regard to management support system so it would be significant to remeber that the executives should not care for the sales amount or figures as they do not play any kind of role in the management support system.
So the same would be relevant
Hence, the correct option is a.
Answer:
Imports
Explanation:
Dominique owns an international grocery store, the World Food Market, where customers can purchase foods and canned goods from other countries. World Food Market is an example of a company that imports. Dominique imports products from different countries and make them available to its customers on their shelves. They have to buy those products from different sources. For this purpose, they have to put large amount of efforts in order to contact the foreign vendors and get their product imported in their country and ultimately at their store by spending costs and efforts. By importing products from other country, they can provide large product assortment to their customers.
Answer: C.$221.86
Explanation:
Contribution Margin is the difference between the sales price and the variable costs.
Best case scenario of Sales would mean it is the higher amount.
Best case scenario of costs would mean the lower amount.
Best case Sales
= 349 * ( 1 + 3%)
= $359.47
Best Case Variable Cost
= 139 * ( 1 - 1%)
= $137.61
Best Case Contribution Margin
= Best case Sales - Best Case Variable Cost
= 359.47 - 137.61
= $221.86
Answer:
The basic difference between both are explained below.
Explanation:
Explicit collusion is where firms meet and agree to charge the same price, and an example of implicit collusion is price leadership. Unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion is where firms signal to each other without actually meeting and agreeing to charge the same price.
Unlike explicit collusion, wherever the occurrence of an accommodation that would lend ammunition for an antitrust court case might be unscrewed, implied collusion is challenging to document as well as to verify. Implicit collusion frequently seems to be nothing more than all firms individually responding to shifting market circumstances.
