1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ostrovityanka [42]
3 years ago
6

What most accurately captures a criticism about the requirement to take bar examinations in order to become a licensed lawyer? a

. Bar exams "cost too much and exact great liabilities" b. Bar exams "psychologically tax the spirit" while "taxing the bar regulators that grade them" c. Bar exams require "extensive preparation without extensive knowledge" d. Bar exams "test too much and too little"
Law
2 answers:
Elan Coil [88]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The best criticizism is that Bar exams "cost too much and exact great liabilities" Option A is the most correct option

Explanation: Bar exams are used to regulate the number of people that are practical layers. This exam is taken after you've successfully graduated from a law school.

The exam has been designed to favor only the rich, as the poor finds it very difficult to pay the fees involved. The law school is very costly, as the books and course handout are always costly. The exam is too costly that you need a loan that should not be less that $140,000 to complete your studies, leading to big liability to pay off, when you have started practicing. Even when you have passed the exams, you are still meant to pay for your license.

The government should try and subsidize the amount of money been paid for Bar exam, as this will help to increase the boundaries of licensing outstanding layers, thereby creating an equal opportunity chance for the rich and the poor to practice law.

guajiro [1.7K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c. Bar exams require "extensive preparation without extensive knowledge"

Explanation:

Finishing law school is not enough for someone to become a lawyer. This is because after graduation, you must pass the BAR exam to be considered a lawyer.

However, this exam is very difficult and requires great preparation from your candidates. The biggest problem with this is that the exam requires a lot of preparation, but little knowledge, since candidates end up getting too attached to concepts and guidelines, decorating them often, and not knowing how to apply them in practice.

This ends up generating professionals with little "cleverness" to solve the cases that are involved, as they are attached to decorated concepts that are not always applicable in the real world.

You might be interested in
As far as alalcohol laws are concerned what is a private club
kkurt [141]

Guests possess the alcoholic drinks of a Private Club. Guests aren't accredited to pay for any provider of alcoholic drinks. Guests have to pay for any alcoholic drinks they consume.

<h3>What is a private club?</h3>

A private club can be defined as an affiliation of people for a few, common purposes. The regulation permits a personal membership to serve and provide to serve alcohol to its members, even in a dry area, as lengthy because it holds a legitimate personal membership allowed by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission ("TABC").

Thus, A private club can be defined as an affiliation of people for a few, common purposes.

learn more about a private club:

brainly.com/question/4483904

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Why have some states placed restrictions on intrastate and interstate branches? What historical laws gave this right to states?
BigorU [14]

Answer:

The wave of bank failures in the 1920s threatened to undermine political support for banks. Eight states located in the east and south allowed the opening of branches without restrictions. Another 13 states allowed the opening of branches with strong restrictions to protect competition from bankers in rural areas.

Explanation:

The Grass-Steagall Act of 1933 was used to support unit banks and preserve their income by isolating them from competition. This law was designed to hinder the chains and groups of unit banks to organize themselves in a farm. This law discouraged bank consolidation by limiting operations when subscribing securities by banks. The ban on paying interest on demand deposits affected banks even more.

The reforms of the 1930s not only managed to limit mortgage loans, but also established certain specific restrictions to attract agricultural interests affected government subsidies.

A major blow to these laws that prohibited the opening of interstate branches came in 1982, when the Bank Holdings Act of 1956 was amended by Congress to allow bankrupt banks to get acquired by any bank holding .

The final blow to the unit banks came in 1994, when Congress reached the Riegle-Neal Law on interstate banking and branch efficiency. With this law, banks have branches both inside and outside the borders.

6 0
4 years ago
2. Jane Jackson purchased a sealed can of Katydids, chocolate-covered pecan caramel candies manufactured by Nestle. Shortly afte
Ghella [55]

Answer:

The argument for the company would be based on the fact that, she could have had a defective tooth which only broke while eating the Katydids candies.<em> Most times, the warranty offered in food is with regards to the food being expired, unwholesome for eating due to foreign materials inside etc.</em>

<em>Her filing for breach of warranty over her defective tooth is uncalled for.</em>

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Paralegals handle sensitive information related to legal cases and are often responsible for creating and maintaining legal docu
klio [65]

Answer:What are the ethical violations of a paralegal?

Here are five ethical dilemmas that paralegals encounter in their work:

Unauthorized Practice. ...

Maintaining Confidentiality. ...

Supervising Attorney Reviewing the Paralegal's Work. ...

Role of Technology. ...

Conflicts of Interest

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
During a criminal trial, lawyers use their opening statements in order to:
katovenus [111]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

An opening statement forecasts to the jury the evidence they will see and hear during the trial—it allows the jury to know what to expect and to be able to understand the evidence when it is presented.

(please give brainliest)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The behavioral science unit is part of what agency
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following positions is considered to be a chief officer? (There may be more than one.)
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following are more likely to happen if you have bad credit? Check all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • Public information officer awareness
    9·1 answer
  • How can you count following distance?
    8·1 answer
  • What can the criminal justice system do to better prepare for future terrorist incidents?
    11·1 answer
  • Free points just say yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet ok?
    15·1 answer
  • The specific portion of the US Constitution which deals with the Federal Court System is _______.
    12·1 answer
  • Match each US political idea to the document it was borrowed from.
    8·1 answer
  • By european law, feta cheese can only be called feta if it is produced in what country?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!