1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saveliy_v [14]
3 years ago
9

Why would the "group of 10" environmental organizations be criticized? Group of answer choices They are militant and extremist g

roups that lead to environmental revolutions. They oppose most environmental protection. They tend to compromise and cooperate with the establishment. Their membership is small and they have focused and limited influence. They support radical approaches in addressing environmental problems.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Svetlanka [38]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Option 3 is the answer - 3-They tend to compromise and cooperate with the establishment.

Explanation:

Environmental activists and authors have accused the  "group of 10" environmental organizations of abandoning long-lasting solutions to impacts global warming to side with some of the most notorious polluters in recent times. These organizations, who were said to be receiving monetary donations from ordinary concerned American citizens for their good works, now operate as corporate entities and then support the agenda of big polluters in return for money.

You might be interested in
. A traffic light is red, but a peace officer is signaling you to continue driving. What should you do
poizon [28]

Answer:

If a peace officer is signaling you to continue driving, stop first, then obey the officer.

Explanation:

Even if it conflicts with existing signals or signs, one must obey any traffic signal or order given by a peace officer.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explica por qué es importante que las construcciones de fábricas sean aprobadas por del Director Regional del Trabajo. Apoya tu
Lunna [17]
Sorry I can’t help wish I could good luck
3 0
2 years ago
What were the three key outcomes of the progressive movement?
alexdok [17]

Answer:  Two of the most important outcomes of the Progressive Era were the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Amendments, the first of which outlawed the manufacturing, sale, or transport of alcohol, and the second of which enfranchised women with the right to vote.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which location is mild ?<br> A.United kingdom<br> B.Russia
telo118 [61]

Answer:

i believe it is Russia

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the goal of simon bolivar for latin america in the 19th century?
Allushta [10]

Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.

His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Louis XIV secure support from the nobility?
    8·1 answer
  • The __________ context of midlife development supports the notion that changing times and different social expectations influenc
    11·1 answer
  • What is the main goal of No Child Left Behind? History of Public Education: Select the best answer from the choices provided. To
    12·2 answers
  • What year did the attempted coup take place in trinidad and tobago
    6·2 answers
  • __________ is a political and economic theory of social organization which says that the means of production, distribution, and
    11·1 answer
  • Another word for living things
    14·2 answers
  • Name some examples of impartiality
    9·1 answer
  • Every time she goes out, Danah has to rush home after being overwhelmed by dizzy spells, an irregular heartbeat, and feeling as
    10·1 answer
  • Switzerland has direct democracy, Find out the elements that help in having direct democracy in Switzerland ? Why India cannot h
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the description that applies to the substance represented by each nfpa diamond.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!