Answer:
Having more oil than water can majorly affect the country because - as we already know - oil is very damaging to the environment if mishandled, however, it brings in a pretty hefty profit. Although it brings in money, water is more important. That brings us to the answer to our question: Having more oil than water affects the way that the countries economy functions because the less water you have, the more the people of the country are effected and the more that the countries economy is damaged (this means that people are then being negatively effected and this can cause everything to fall apart).
Does this answer your question? If it doesn't make sense, I can always clarify.
Hope this helps!!
Have a nice day :)
Explanation:
Because the most important things are not forgotten
Answer:
Bro the last words are english
Explanation:
1.hqsjnd dus may mgaf fhdh
Nonhuman animals cannot use symbols to transmit the complex aspects of their culture to their offspring because animals that are not human utilize symbols that have predetermined meanings, and because of this, they are unable to modify these symbols in order to represent abstract ideas and principles.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are animals?</h3>
Generally, a living entity that derives its nutrition from organic materials and that, as a rule, has specialized sensory organs, a neurological system, and the ability to react swiftly to stimuli.
In conclusion, Because nonhuman animals utilize symbols with predetermined meanings, they are unable to alter these symbols in order to communicate abstract ideas and principles.
Read more about animals
brainly.com/question/26489627
#SPJ1
Answer:
Substantive due process
Explanation:
The substantive due process theory of the constitutional law that prohibit the government from violating the rights of the defendant during the due process.
The first amendment protect the government to prevent the citizens from exercising their free will. Since on the case above the dog fighting is not illegal in japan , the defendant could make a case that the government is violating first amendment during the due process (since he is not informed why he is sentenced from exercising activities that he believed as legal) and can be used as a basis for his appeal.
