1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeTakaya
3 years ago
12

Evaluate the extent to which rulers of Indian states could exercise power independently from the British in the period 1750–1900

.
History
1 answer:
Leona [35]3 years ago
3 0

Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under the British Rule.

Explanation:

The amount of power the ruler had over his dominion were nominal at best and their royalty was subject to the British as they could cite any reason and annex their land from them.

The amount of power the ruler had was also dependent on how closely the British were involved in their territory.

This was to be seen in places like Delhi and Calcutta where the British influence was more than in fringes  like Kerala and Orrissa where the King still had more power.

The power of the ruler was subject to the needs and interference of the British.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15650754#readmore

You might be interested in
How did the Munich Conference relate to Germany's attempts to annex Czechoslovakia? A. The agreement reached at the Munich Confe
Leto [7]
The answer is d hope it helps
5 0
3 years ago
What basis does the Court use to decide whether or not a right is incorporated to the states?
katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause

Explanation:

When deciding whether a right is incorporated to the states (and all levels of government), the Court considers whether the right is “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty”, or otherwise “fundamental”. If the right is fundamental, it applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did large numbers of Hindus and Muslims
kvv77 [185]
There were several reasons why large numbers of Hindus and Muslims <span>migrated immediately after India gained its independence but the best option is "</span>(4) The subcontinent was divided into countries
based primarily on the location of religious
<span>majorities"</span>
6 0
4 years ago
The number one factor that determines a person's political affiliation is which of the following?
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

Explanation: partisan identity

7 0
3 years ago
Why would have the radical republican plan would have worked after the civil war
bija089 [108]

Answer:

The Radical Republicans were a faction of the Republican Party during the American Civil War. They were distinguished by their fierce advocacy for the abolition of slavery, enfranchisement of black citizens, and holding the Southern states financially and morally culpable for the war.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Summarize the views regarding U.S. imperialism
    6·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms. The major asked me to have a drink with him and two other officers. We dra
    14·2 answers
  • The map shows the physical features of Northern Africa.
    5·2 answers
  • Explain in your own words how Henry Grady affected the South’s economy during the Reconstruction period?
    6·1 answer
  • Coco quinn the 12 year old girl and gavin magnus
    15·1 answer
  • Who Discovered America? 4 / 30. ...
    15·2 answers
  • What are the different rules about citizenship or eligibility to live in the United States?
    7·1 answer
  • Was the United States ever directed by the state during the industrial revolution?
    11·2 answers
  • En la cultura los códigos​
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the West and Northeast in favor of internal improvements?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!