Answer:
hazard pay
Explanation:
in the working field if your job is considered dangerous you get hazard pay for "potentially risking your life" while as ateacher there is not a similar threat.
hope this helped!!
Answer:
2. Only counting final goods
Explanation:
When defining national income accounting and terminolgies, emphasis is always laid on "...total value of FINAL goods...". This is as a result of avoiding double counting. If intermediate goods were counted alongside final goods, it would be double counting because intermediate goods are used in producing those final goods. Final goods are good meant for final consumption. The other method used in avoiding double counting ( counting of the value of the same product more than once) apart from counting final gooda is Value added approach.
One thing that helps incumbents win reelection ,which might include federal spending projects benefitting state and local governments, businesses, colleges, and other institutions in a congressional district is
the pork barrel.
Pork barrel :
Pork barrel, or simply pork, is a metaphor for the appropriation of government spending for localized projects secured solely or primarily to bring money to a representative's district.
What is the problem of pork barrel?
The Priority Development Assistance Fund scam, also called the PDAF scam or the pork barrel scam, is a political scandal involving the alleged misuse by several members of the Congress of the Philippines of their Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF, popularly called "pork barrel"), a lump-sum discretionary fund
Learn more about pork barrel:
brainly.com/question/25553299
#SPJ4
Answer: Loss of $22,000
Explanation:
Gain (loss) = Net Carrying Value of Bonds recalled - Price bond called at
Net Carrying Value of Bonds
= Par value - Unamortized discount
= 300,000 - 10,000
= $290,000
Gain (loss) = 290,000 - (300,000 * 104)
= ($22,000)
Answer:
The correct answer is option C.
Explanation:
Suppose there is pessimism in an economy because of corporate scandals, international tensions, loss of confidence, etc. This is going to adversely affect the economy. Because of corporate scandals, the investment will decline. Loss of confidence in consumers will cause a reduction in consumption spending. International tensions cause net exports to decline.
All of this causes aggregate demand to decline. The aggregate demand curve moves to the left. This leftward shift causes both the quantity of output and price to fall. As output fall real GDP will decline as well.
