I think the most appropriate answer would be "Value".
I hope it helped you!
The question is reconstructed below:
Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium?
A. An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their position by adopting an alternative strategy.
B. The unstable outcome of a repeated game.
C. An outcome that is stable only because of credible threats.
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Answer:
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Explanation:
Although Nash equilibrium is a game theory, it has been widely applied in economics. It states that a competitor can achieve his desired outcome by sticking to his original strategy. Both competitors' strategies are optimal when considering the decisions of each other.
Answer:
130.77%
Explanation:
depreciation expense per year using straight method = (purchase cost - salvage value) / useful life = ($86,000 - $7,000) / 10 = $7,900
total costs = depreciation expense + operating and energy costs = $7,900 + $4,190 = $12,090
average rate of return = total savings / total costs = $15,810 / $12,090 = 1.30769 = 130.77%
