Answer:
1<n<5
Step-by-step explanation:
The inequality is more and less than, but not equal to, since the values are between but do not include such values
The answer is D.
You have to get x by itself so add 3 to 7 that equals 10. The signs stay the same so it’s D
The answer would be A. When using Cramer's Rule to solve a system of equations, if the determinant of the coefficient matrix equals zero and neither numerator determinant is zero, then the system has infinite solutions. It would be hard finding this answer when we use the Cramer's Rule so instead we use the Gauss Elimination. Considering the equations:
x + y = 3 and <span>2x + 2y = 6
Determinant of the equations are </span>
<span>| 1 1 | </span>
<span>| 2 2 | = 0
</span>
the numerator determinants would be
<span>| 3 1 | . .| 1 3 | </span>
<span>| 6 2 | = | 2 6 | = 0.
Executing Gauss Elimination, any two numbers, whose sum is 3, would satisfy the given system. F</span>or instance (3, 0), <span>(2, 1) and (4, -1). Therefore, it would have infinitely many solutions. </span>
Answer:
a. Yes, the evidence supports the hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
The evidence supports the hypothesis because it say that "the GREATER the HEIGHT from which you drop a ball ,the FASTER the ball will be traveling when it hits the ground because of gravity and you claimed that the ball dropped from a height of 6 feet has a higher speed than a ball dropped from a height of 3 feet. hope this help! :D
Answer:
See explanation below.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we define first some notation:
A= A new training program will increase customer satisfaction ratings
B= The training program can be kept within the original budget allocation
And for these two events we have defined the following probabilities
We are assuming that the two events are independent so then we have the following propert:
And we want to find the probability that the cost of the training program is not kept within budget or the training program will not increase the customer ratings so then if we use symbols we want to find:
And using the De Morgan laws we know that:
So then we can write the probability like this:
And using the complement rule we can do this:
Since A and B are independent we have:
And then our final answer would be:
