1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
belka [17]
3 years ago
9

Which number when multiplied by 2/3, results in a number greater than 2/3?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
6 0

D. Hope that is the answer

You might be interested in
Eduardo and Krystal each improved their yards by planting daylilies and shrubs. They bought their supplies from the same store.
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:$9 daylilies, $4shrubs. 9x5=45+4x5=20 $65. 9x4=36+10x4=$76

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!
Bad White [126]
2^x-3

im taking this test today as well, and i have the answer to this question on the study guide so this is right.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This should be easy to answer with a calculator but I don’t really have a calculator on hand lol so please solve it for me:
GuDViN [60]

Answer:

- 132

Step-by-step explanation:

This can be evaluated without a calculator.

Take each part of the calculation and evaluate, that is

- 6(3)(- 4) = - 6 × - 12 = 72

3(3)²(- 4) = 3 × 9 × - 4 = - 12 × 9 = - 108

2(3)(- 4)² = 6 × 16 = 96

Putting the 3 parts back together

72 - 108 - 96

= 72 - 204

= - 132

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME OMG!!!
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

187.5

Step-by-step explanation:

17 × 5 = 85

100 - 85 = 15% = 0.15

1250 × 0.15 = 157.5

7 0
3 years ago
What is the value of x?<br> (6x – 1)º<br> (5x + 5)º<br> (4x + 8)º<br> (3x)º<br> (5x + 3)º<br> X =
konstantin123 [22]

Step-by-step explanation:

(1 point)

No, there isn't a more efficient way to solve this system.

Yes, a more efficient way is to multiply the first equation by 4, add to eliminate y, then solve for x.

Yes, a more efficient way is to multiply the first equation by −4, add to eliminate y, then solve for x.

Yes, a more efficient way is to multiply the first equation by −4, add to eliminate x, then solve for y.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The sum of two consecutive odd integers is 188. list the numbers from smallest to largest:
    10·1 answer
  • 1. Suppose xy = 20, where x and y are functions of t. What
    11·1 answer
  • Select all the statements that describe the expression 5 + 2x.
    8·2 answers
  • if the air temperature is 20°c and the relative humidity is 55 percent, will the dew point be reached if the temperature drops t
    5·1 answer
  • Find the area of the composite figure. Round to the nearest hundredth.
    5·1 answer
  • I don’t understand how to do this
    15·2 answers
  • What’s 6+1 beacause I need to know pleaseee help
    14·3 answers
  • The price of a watch was increased by 20% to £198<br> What was the price before the increase?
    6·2 answers
  • 50 POINTS !!<br><br><br> PLEASE HELP !! ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE RIGHT ANSWERS.
    8·2 answers
  • Is almost always better to cite exact numbers rather than to round statistics up or down true or false
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!