1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LuckyWell [14K]
3 years ago
9

In Furman v Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that in certain cases, the death penalty was cruel and unusual. How did this ruling

impact the rights of persons accused of a crime?
History
2 answers:
Nonamiya [84]3 years ago
7 0
The Supreme Court's ruling forced all states, if they employed the death penalty for any crimes, to take measures to ensure that they did not do so in any manner that that showed discrimination or was applied arbitrarily rather than according to consistent practice.

In the short run, it meant a moratorium on capital punishment while states reevaluated their criminal justice practices.
monitta3 years ago
5 0

Answer: C. Eighth Amendment protections were strengthened.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which policy is most similar to Soviet social reforms under Vladimir Lenin?
Marta_Voda [28]
The answer to this equation is C obviously
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Wich of the following would be an example of a social impact of the imperialism of Africa?
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Who was Jane Addams?
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

American settlement activist

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which Statement Best Describes John C Calhoun
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
<span>a two-time vice president who supported slavery and states’ rights </span>
4 0
4 years ago
Is conflict unavoidable between Israel and Palestines? Why or why not?
Sonbull [250]
Hello there and thank you for joining Brainly, first of all. :)

Coming from a perspective of society and civilians, war is always unavoidable. However, there is a fine line between what is known as war and what conflict would be. And conflict, in most terms, is defined as complications. Complications can be resolved without further action, like war. That is, through discussions and government. 

Throughout history, we've heard of Crusades, and wars between these two unsettling countries. One, however, is struggling through poverty, and one.. well, lets just say is a powerful force. So, to help explain what the issue is between the two countries - both seemingly claim Jerusalem (or the holy land) as theirs. Multiple minor issues have arose between the times, but most of the conflict seems to be in a strip on Palestine's end called "Gaza". Also known as where the two meet for war. Other areas struggle as well, but to sum this all up, civilians live in places where war is going on. That, right there, is war crime. And war crime on both ends since both did not find a solution to their arguments and disputes. Considering residents of both countries live there, that is also a complete disaster. 

So, moving on the question. Because the lack of accurate information has stung everyone, we don't quite know who is the right hand of this argument. Neither do we know under who's ownership the holy land is for sure, and who is sincerely belongs to. 
However, we can say that the dispute is avoidable under a circumstance. That is, to either 
1) Share the holy land, and unite as a state (which would be quite a difficulty considering both are of different religions)
2) Have one take it over (and that won't happen soon, in my view. Both hold is tightly and yearn for it strongly). 

Since both are terribly rare solutions, we can come to the conclusion that the conflict is unavoidable. Both believe it is their right to claim it, and all we can say is: May peace be embedded soon. I really hate seeing headlines that speak of more people dying and no one is doing anything about it. It hurts me greatly. 

I hope this helps you. Of course, this question is based off of a personal point of view. If this was explained it your class, and your instructor gave a direct answer to this question, you should probably trust your teacher because I'm no politician. (soon to be, though)
Please forgive me for any grammatical errors or spelling mistakes.

Thank you! :) I enjoyed answering this one.  
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the goals of the Radical Republicans?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the main affect of the WAR 1812
    14·1 answer
  • Which entity has the responsibility of establishing a cohesive vision for partisan identifiers nationwide?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the main issue for why possible delegates didn't go to the Constitutional Convention? A. Increasing power of the nation
    7·2 answers
  • The impeachment of President Andrew Johnson was due to
    9·2 answers
  • The first political parties in the United States were
    12·2 answers
  • Explain how a person’s petition gets officially noticed by the White House.
    8·1 answer
  • I need to know how the Arab spring affected syria
    9·1 answer
  • In the early 1800s, immigrants from Ireland settled in the northeastern United States, resulting in
    7·2 answers
  • Write three paragraphs that explain the importance of Justinian’s political, social, and architectural achievements. Explain wha
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!