1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SOVA2 [1]
3 years ago
11

Use long division to find the quotient below.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Number B: 4x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

I used synthetic division instead, But hope this helps.

Brut [27]3 years ago
5 0

(4x² - 7x - 2) ÷ (x-2)

I have placed the terms corresponding to each variable, for x squared I put 4, for x - 7 and for c (constant) I put - 2.

We go down 4, which will multiply to 2.

¿Why 2?

This is obtained by matching the denominator to 0.

x-2=0\rightarrow \boxed{x=2}

Then we multiply 4 by 2, give us 8, add this value to the variable x (- 7), we have 1.

Multiply 1 by 2, give us 2, add this value to the constant (- 2), we have 0. ¡Finish!

Answer: 4x + 1

You might be interested in
Have even leader = 16.91 oz how many ounces are in 3 leaders
kiruha [24]
Multiple 16.91 by 3
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please Help me
Tomtit [17]

Answer:a x=-27 b x=0

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Same test, similar question! please help!
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Idg

Step-by-step explanation:

Please Explain in the comments

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Complete the statement with <, >, or =.
GrogVix [38]

Answer:

>

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it w
sdas [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variables of interest are:

X₁: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the placebo vaccine.

n₁= 201299 total children studied

x₁= 110 cases observed

X₂: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the experimental vaccine.

n₂= 200745 total children studied

x₂= 33 cases observed

These two variables have a binomial distribution. The parameters of interest, the ones to compare, are the population proportions: p₁ vs p₂

You have to test if the population proportions of children who contracted polio in both groups are different: p₂ ≠ p₁

a)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.05

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

Sample proportion placebo p'₁= x₁/n₁= 110/201299= 0.0005

Sample proportion vaccine p'₂= x₂/n₂= 33/200745= 0.0002

Pooled sample proportion p'= (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂)= (110+33)/(201299+200745)= 0.0004

Z_{H_0}= \frac{(0.0002-0.0005)-0}{\sqrt{0.0004[\frac{1}{201299} +\frac{1}{200745} ]} }= -4.76

This test is two-tailed, using the critical value approach, you have to determine two critical values:

Z_{\alpha/2}= Z_{0.025}= -1.96

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.975}= 1.96

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -1.96 or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 1.96, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -1.96 < Z_{H_0} < 1.96, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

b)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.01

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

The value of Z_{H_0}= -4.76 doesn't change, since we are working with the same samples.

The only thing that changes alongside with the level of significance is the rejection region:

Z_{\alpha /2}= Z_{0.005}= -2.576

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.576

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -2.576or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 2.576, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.576< Z_{H_0} < 2.576, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

c)

Remember the level of significance (probability of committing type I error) is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. This means that the smaller this value is, the fewer chances you have of discarding the true null hypothesis. But as you know, you cannot just reduce this value to zero because, the smaller α is, the bigger β (probability of committing type II error) becomes.

Rejecting the null hypothesis using different values of α means that there is a high chance that you reached a correct decision (rejecting a false null hypothesis)

I hope this helps!

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Line segment DG contains the point D(−2, 3) and a midpoint at O(3, −1.5). What is the location of endpoint G?
    7·1 answer
  • Find the product of 1359 and 8
    13·1 answer
  • The wheels on a bike have a 12 inch diameter. What is the circumference? c=Pi,d
    12·2 answers
  • On a grid, what is the distance between two points located at<br> (0, 0) and (4, 14)
    7·1 answer
  • Which description corresponds to the relationship shown in the table
    6·1 answer
  • Simplify each of the following by rationalizing the denominator.<br> please do answer my doubt
    10·1 answer
  • What is the constant for the following relationship? 24 = 2k<br>​
    10·1 answer
  • Write an expression for the quotient of twelve divided by the sum of two times g and one.
    9·1 answer
  • A seed company planted a floral mosaic of a national flag. The perimeter of the flag is 420 feet. Determine the​ flag's length a
    14·1 answer
  • Please help me with this, I need this by tomorrow!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!