1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastasy [175]
3 years ago
13

It’s worth 20 points

History
1 answer:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: it's the first box

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statements describe the rising action of a tragedy’s plot? Select 2 options.
seropon [69]

Answer:

A series of events develop the plot’s central conflict.

Suspense builds gradually as the plot progresses.

Explanation:

Rising action in a story is when there is tension in the story and the main conflict happens. It happens before the climax of the story, where there is a build-up of tension in the story and the main conflict of the story is presented.

Thus, the rising action in a story is when a series of events develop from the plot's central conflict, resulting in the build-up of suspense in the story. This will eventually lead to the climax of the story and then bring upon the falling action.

Thus, the correct answers are the first and third options.  

4 0
4 years ago
in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?
Vilka [71]
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How did ancient greek art influence the world
mart [117]
Sculptures were the big thing in ancient Greece. Specifically the ones of men and women. You have probably seen pictures of them before they are called Kouri. Materials used in Ancient Greece influence today's art. Such as stone and marble. Also in Greece, they used a lot of geometric patterns and some would say abstract.
8 0
3 years ago
Please help.25 Points! I will give Brainliest Answer to the fastest and very good answer. With the publication of Uncle Tom’s Ca
allochka39001 [22]

The reason why Harriet Beecher Stowe published her book is to show and highlight the evilness inside of slavery and how it is effecting lives. In doing this, she actually angered the Southern-Slave holders and they ended up inspiring the slave trade even more than before.

Hope this helps you!

8 0
3 years ago
In World War I, this was the line of fighting that stretched from Belgium southward through most of France
Dmitry [639]
<span>Western Front is the answer                                                                                                        </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What issues were affecting children
    6·1 answer
  • What was one characteristic unique to olmec culture?
    14·1 answer
  • The colonies that become the original United States were part of which European nations land claims
    9·1 answer
  • The allies considered world war ii a "total war"; thus, one consequence of the allied victory was what
    7·1 answer
  • How did expansionism pave the way for world war ii?
    12·1 answer
  • What desire drove the early European explorations?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Ravensdale mine explosion impact Washington State?
    13·1 answer
  • What event took place during the Hundred Years’ war?
    13·1 answer
  • Which civilizations were located on the banks of the Nile River?
    11·1 answer
  • Explain how the vietnam war illustrates a post wwii conflict caused by decolonization.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!