Answer:
Following are the responses to the given question:
Explanation:
I possess good leadership qualities that distinguish me from other potential people. I also strong position in leading groups. In contact I'm fine. I'm nice. I convey my thoughts but also hear everything they have and say quite well in front of others. I am now a logical thinking instructor and make rational and factual decisions. I am supermotard and face a difficult problem while other potential employees may try to avoid problems or challenges and run away from them.
Its business I am employed for is better for me since I could be a great asset for the business which can successfully do any job it could do. For every job or job that my boss provides to me, I'd try my support. I'm timely but good for individuals who are very important to influence and manage. Let us say that I'll be a salesperson so I can influence customers or their selection of purchase by my social skills. I'd use my abilities and close the boss's sales contract.
Answer:
B. resources to implement strategies are firm-specific and attached to firms over the long-term
Explanation:
Society can attain a higher degree of specialization without the use of money than it can with money. The given statement is false.
In order to become more effective, specialization in business is concentrating on a single product or a small range of items. Specialization can boost productivity and give a company or economy a competitive advantage.
A speedier, more efficient workflow is the outcome of each person being able to give their particular task the degree of focus they are capable of. Through specialization, a worker can leverage their education and work history to speed up procedures and boost sales.
One nation might, for instance, be a specialist in growing coffee beans, giving it a competitive edge. Additionally, it can enable this nation to use its current resources to create a sizable quantity of high-quality coffee beans.
Learn more about specialization here
brainly.com/question/24448534
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: It won't be able to eat.
In wild life, this type of condition is basically a death sentence for the organism who experience it. The only way for the tiger to survive in such situation is only if humans making an intervention by surgically fix them or find another pathways to injects the nutrition into the tiger's body.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
We should note that microeconomics deal with a particular sector in the economy and not the whole sector. Macroeconomic deals with the whole economy and looks at ways by which the decisions of government have an effect on the whole economy.
Based on the above explanation, the answer is provided below:
• The effect of government regulation on a monopolist's production decisions= Microeconomics
• The effects of government tax policy on long-term economic growth = Macroeconomics
• The optimal interest rate for the Federal Reserve to target = Macroeconomics