Answer:
Explanation:
Early warning system of radar and observers
Royal Air Force (RAF)
Luftwaffe
Built more spitfires and hawkers
<u>Original Question</u><u><em>: What is the significance of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887?</em></u>
<u></u>
<u>Answer: Choice (B)</u> or <u>The act established some of the first steps to allow congress to regulate interstate trade</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<em>Reason:</em>
- <em>Choice (A) is incorrect because these laws were set up to regulate industries, not to ban certain monopolies</em>
- <em>Choice (B) is correct because it was the first attempt by the government to implement rules to prevent railroads from setting up outlandish prices</em>
- <em>Choice (C) is incorrect because this act didn't have any relation with the Apache Indians</em>
- <em>Choice (D) is incorrect because this wasn't the first time that the US set up a law that influenced the economy</em>
<em />
Hope that helps!
Answer:
Economists divide the factors of production into four categories: land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship. I know entreprenuership isn't on there, but i think you'll get the answer from the first three.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. They needed the constitution to approve the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
The Federalists did not want a bill of right. They thought the new constitution was sufficient. But, the anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
Hope this helps
-Amelia
Answer:
What does the fifth amendment protect?
The Fifth Amendment protects the right to avoid incriminating yourself. A defendant can plead the Fifth Amendment if a lawyer asks a question that the defendant would incriminate himself or herself by answering truthfully.
Explanation:
Constitutional Issue ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees that “no person . . . shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right was made
part of the Bill of Rights to prevent a tyrannical government from forcing accused persons
to confess to crimes they may or may not have committed. Miranda’s case before the
Supreme Court was based on this Fifth Amendment protection. The Court accepted the
case in order to explore and clarify certain problems arising from earlier decisions related
to the rights of individuals taken into police custody. The precise question that the Court
explored was under what circumstances an interrogation may take place so that a confession made during the interrogation would be constitutionally admissible in a court of law.
★★★★★★★
