Answer:
1. Journal entries are quicker and more comfortable in the manual accounting
2. Posting is easier in computer software-based accounting
3. Trial balance adjustment in manual accounting is tricky. However, a lengthy process may pose a challenge for computerized accounting.
4. Financial statements are more straightforward in software-based accounting than manual accounting
Explanation:
The introduction of accounting software such as QuickBooks has transformed the working for accounting professionals. The conventional accounting system replacement has made the job more comfortable. However, there are new challenges added, such as learning the software, making error-free inputs, and pace of computer-related entries. However, considering that once these skills are learned, the overall job is easier than before.
1. Journal entries in manual are made quicker, and errors can be rectified. However, entries are linked automatically to their respective ledgers that solve the challenges with compound entries
2. Posting is simpler in software as the general ledger is created on a single click. Manual posting requires time and efforts
3. Adjusted entries need to manual input in conventional method to create the adjusted trial balance whereas, in software, its added through adjusting journal entries.
4. Financial statements are much more straightforward in software as they are available on one click, whereas in manual accounting, they are required to be calculated.
With the absence of the options to choose from, lets look at general results of using cost-benefit analysis.
Explanation:
using cost-benefit analysis is a strategic way of making decisions based on cost and benefit solely.
Ideally any investment or strategic decision to be made by an institution needs a cost-benefit analysis.
This is done by listing all the projected resources needed to take up the strategic objective and costed. After which another list is made of the potential benefit that is likely to come to the organisation.
When the two is compared we say <em>you are making cost-benefit </em>analysis.
More often without secondary reasons, the option with the highest benefit over cost is chosen.
This cost and benefit analysis are made both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Quantitatively methods such as NPV are used.
#learnwithbrainly
The answer for
1) 3 socks
2) 5 socks
3) 1 pair of socks
Explanation:
1) In the second trial, you choose one color, you say black, first, and second, say blue. The third sock you're taking out now has two black or brown. Therefore, you must draw at least 3 socks to ensure that you have a single color pair..
2) You get black first.
You're pulling out brown, second.
You tear down charcoal, Thrid.
Second, you cut out charcoal. (one pair complete)
Second, you're only heading out. (2 pairs full) Thus, you have to take out at least 5 socks to guarantee two pairs in the same colour.
3) You want 1 pair of black socks
The worst case is: [ 5 blu ]
The 6th pick guarantees you will have 1 pair of black socks
Answer:
$269,158.88
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Before the difference of the amount, first we have to determine the value of the wine after one year which is shown below:
= $2,400,000 + $2,400,000 × 10%
= $2,400,000 + $240,000
= $2,640,000
And, the interest rate is 7%
Plus the additional cost is $360,000
So, the value of the wine now is
= ($2,640,000 - $360,000) ÷ (1 + 0.07)
= $2,130,841.12
So, the difference is
= $2,400,000 - $2,130,841.12
= $269,158.88
