Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.
GDP (gross domestic product) is one of the primary factors used to test the countries economic health. It represents the total dollar value of all goods and services produced over a specific period.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
3.6%
Explanation:
965x = 1000
x = 1.03626
That’s an interest rate of 3.6%.
Answer:
$26 per share
Explanation:
The computation of the today stock price is shown below:
= Selling price of per share ÷ (number of completed ÷ number of stock split)
= $90 ÷ (7 ÷ 2)
= $90 ÷ 3.5
= $26 per share
We first divide the number of completed with the number of stock split. The value come is divided to selling price per share so that the accurate price of the stock can come.
Reformation would be most effective in the case of Fred and Wilma.
<h3>What is the contract?</h3>
A promise that is enforceable by law is a contract. The commitment could be to carry out or abstain from a certain action. A contract must be made by two or more parties who must agree to it, with one of them typically making a proposal and the others accepting it.
The contract will be reformed as this was an error that was made with regard to the amount of $44 instead of $4. Fred was at a mistake but the change is going to happen with the same cause.
When an error has been made in a compact, the tribunal has the equitable authority to reconstruct it to match the parties' real intentions.
Learn more about the contract, here:
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ1
