I think the answer would be fixed ration schedule of reinforcement. It is the type that would yield the highest rate of response. Schedule of reinforcement are rules that would contain what behaviors that will have consequences and what are these consequences and degree of the punishment
The differences are:
- Traditional parenting focus on telling what the children need to do rather than guiding the children to achieve success in whatever career they're interested in
- Traditional parenting only had to focus how the children communicate with peers in real life while modern parents have to concerned about how they behav in virtual world
- Modern parenting tend to be open minded in handling new societal issues compared to traditional parents
Answer:
A developing country (or a low and middle-income country (LMIC), less developed country, less economically developed country (LEDC), medium-industrialized country or underdeveloped country) is a country with a less developed industrial base and a low Human Development Index (HDI) relative to other countries.
These principles MOST LIKELY represent
c. the main ideas of the State Constitution
Explanation:
The ideas of wisdom justice and moderation are a part of democracy for since its inception so it is to be understood in terms of the overarching ideals of the form of constitution of the state.
It is less likely to represent the different form of governance as the ideals such as these are to be found in all forms of government. The legislature must be full of wisdom and justice to be moderating.
Thus these are core values that represent the constitution and its aim as a body of laws and directions.
Answer:
There were not "branches" of government in the modern sense with the judiciary separated from the legislature and the executive. But Ammianus is not correct that the Senate had "all" the power either. The Senate appointed the Consuls each year (the executives, who effectively took the place of kings) and pretty much all the other officials. Senate resolutions (consults) had virtually the force of law. The Senate itself could act as a judiciary over its own members, particularly in cases of treason and such, and the officials they appointed had judicial as well as executive powers in their respective jurisdictions.
But there were also other, broader assemblies, of the army, the citizens, and the plebs (the membership of which would have overlapped a lot), and each of those had genuine powers. Formal written laws (leges) had to be voted in by the citizen assembly - they couldn't be simply decreed by the senate, and they had more weight than senate consults. Perhaps most importantly, the tribunes of the plebs had veto power over the acts of any official, which was a protection of the rights of common citizens against abuse by patricians.
The whole thing had begun with revolt against the abuses of corrupt kings. The senate had probably been a council of nobles advising the kings before that. With the kings gone, the senate took control, and the appointment of consuls was a way to have someone fill the roles kings had played like leading the army. Over the first couple of centuries of the republic, there was great civil strife between patricians (nobles in the senate) and plebeians (commoners), particularly over burdens of military service and taxation. The outcome of it was the growth of the plebeian assembly's powers and the tribunes, and the creation of a system that would admit leading plebeians as well as patricians to the senate's ranks through public service. So it all evolved in response to the demands of the time.<u>(Answer not mine)</u>
