Honestly, I don't know, but please give 5 stars and a Thank you anyway !!! I NEED it!!! It would be greatly appreciated!
The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
C.) smuggling and organized crime became a commonplace to meet the strong demand for alcohol
Answer:
Within the scope of the slave trade, African states- not all were tribes- already dealt in slaves within Africa. Such, British ships were simply another consumer with whom they participated in trade, often exchanging the human cargoes for gunpowder weaponry and the like.
Explanation: