Answer:
D) 1/5 e 1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
You have the following quadratic equation:
(1)
In order to find the values of x that are solution to the equation (1), you first find the solution for k in the following equation:

Next, you replace the previous value of k in the equation (1) and you use the quadratic formula to find the roots:

Then, the roots of the equation (1) are
D) 1/5 e 1/3
Answer:
The best estimate of the area of the larger figure is 
Step-by-step explanation:
step 1
<em>Find the scale factor</em>
we know that
If two figures are similar, then the ratio of its corresponding sides is equal to the scale factor
Let
z----> the scale factor
x-----> the corresponding side of the larger figure
y-----> the corresponding side of the smaller figure
so

we have


substitute
-----> the scale factor
step 2
<em>Find the area of the larger figure</em>
we know that
If two figures are similar, then the ratio of its areas is equal to the scale factor squared
Let
z----> the scale factor
x-----> the area of the larger figure
y-----> the area of the smaller figure
so

we have


substitute and solve for x

Multiply (13.2 cm) by (1 inch/2.54 cm). That gives you the whole length in inches. If it's more than 12, then take as many 12s away from it as you can, and call each of those '1 foot'. When you can't take 12 away any more, then what you have left is the inches.
By definition, if
is the least upper bound of the set
, it means two thing:
In other words, the least upper bound of a set is greater than or equal to every single element of the set, but it is "close enough" to the elements of the set, because you guaranteed to find elements in the set between
and 
For example, pick
. Obvisouly, the least upper bound is
. In fact, every number in
is smaller than 10, but as soon as you take away something from 10, say 0.01, you get 9.99, and there are elements in
greater than 9.99, say 9.9999.
So, the claim is basically proven by definition: if
, let
. By definition, there exists
.