1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Levart [38]
3 years ago
7

What restrictions still remain for women in the Middle East?

History
2 answers:
klio [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

they still cant show skin and cant go in public without a man

Explanation:

rodikova [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:Generally, Middle Eastern women enjoy something close to legal equality with men in political life, access to education, professional opportunities, and salaries - goals for which Western women have long had to struggle. Moreover, Islamic law has from the outset given women full legal capacity once they attain puberty. Even in medieval times Muslim women enjoyed rights that Western women only won much later, such as the right to own and manage property, to sue and to be sued, and to enter into contracts and conduct business. In contrast, where Middle Eastern women have been severely disadvantaged has been in the areas of family law and inheritance, where women are accorded fewer rights than men and are subordinated to male authority.

While the situation of women has been generally worse under customary than under Islamic law, Islamic law itself has many provisions that leave women at a clear disadvantage - an irony of history, since these same provisions at the time of their promulgation in seventh century Arabia originally advanced women's rights vis-a-vis the then existing norms. Under traditional Islamic law, child marriages were allowed; a girl could be forced into marriage by a qualified male relation. While a woman could marry only one man at a time, men were allowed up to four wives and an unlimited number of concubines. Women were legally required to be submissive and obedient to their husbands; were they not, their husbands were entitled to beat them and to suspend all maintenance payments. Obedience included never leaving the house without the husband's blessings; a husband could gel the assistance of the police to forcibly return his wife to the marital home if she were absent without his leave. Her contacts with persons outside the family were similarly subject to restriction at her husband's wishes.

hope it helps :)

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which movement benefited the most from its members' contributions to the war effort during World War 17 (5 points)
Harman [31]
I think women’s suffrage
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which party best reflect own political principles??<br> ASAP PLEASE!!!
Vika [28.1K]

Was it the liberal party?

6 0
3 years ago
Was the north or south better economically prepared to fight in the civil war?
lawyer [7]

Answer:

Generally, the North was militarily better prepared to fight and win the civil war, and this was probably their greatest advantage. The North was overwhelmingly rural but still had a much greater industrial capacity than the South. It had ten times its productive capacity and six times as many factories.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
All voters can participate in what kind of primary?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

B = open

Explanation:

A - probably means absentee ballot, this is not the answer

C - underground voting doesn't make sense for this question, it doesn't even exist to my knowledge

D - integrated voting doesn't say anything about it being open to everyone

B is the correct answer since anyone can vote regardless of their political affiliation

If my answer was helpful add my discord for homework help for cheap ($5 per hw) funnyguy#1226

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
न्यायपालिका को महत्व बारेमा निबन्ध लेख्नहोस्।​
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

न्यायपालिका (न्यायिक प्रणाली वा न्यायाधिकरण) व्यक्ति–व्यक्ति तथा राज्यबीचको विवादको निरुपण गर्ने अदालतीय व्यवस्था हो । जनतालाई पूर्णरूपमा स्वतन्त्र, सार्वभौम तथा न्यायपूर्ण अधिकार प्रदान गर्न राज्यका तीन अङ्ग मध्ये न्यायपालिका एक हो । यो न्यायिक शाखासँग कानुनहरू बदल्ने शक्ति हुन्छ, जसले प्रणालीलाई सुगम रूपमा सञ्चालन गर्दछन् । न्यायपालिकाले पिडित पक्षलाई उचित न्याय दिनुका साथै अन्याय गर्ने व्याक्तिलाई करबाई समेत दिन आग्रह गर्छ ।

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was an important accomplishment of jose de san martin
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the general outlines of Nixon's economic policy. Was it consistent? Was it effective?
    15·1 answer
  • In 1790 there were six slave states; in 1860 there were 15. ·from 1790 until congress banned the importation of slaves from afri
    12·2 answers
  • What is the exact date George Washington became president
    12·1 answer
  • How did Thomas Jefferson respond to the piracy in the Mediterranean?
    5·1 answer
  • Who was Bartolome de las casas?
    12·2 answers
  • List at least three ways in which education and Williamsburg differedfrom education today
    13·2 answers
  • The cultures of the white settlers differed from of that of the native americans. What were the views of both regarding land own
    15·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
    6·2 answers
  • How was william harmon racist?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!