Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
When saying data we can be referring to both private information of the owner of the Smartphone as well as information of the organization since the user uses the phone to connect to services provided by it, which refers to the name of BYOD. The “Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD) phenomenon is based on the modality in which members of an organization are authorized to use their own personal mobile devices (smartphones, tablets, notebooks, etc.) in the activities of the organization where they work connected to the organizational network. The use of their devices to perform their work tasks in the organization causes what was a personal device to become part of the organizational network, with the problems that this could lead to.
Answer: Computer monitor
Explanation:
A complementary good is a good that's used together with another good. A good example of a complementary good is a car and petrol since they are used together.
A complementary good for computer hard drives would be the computer monitor. The monitor simply looks like a television and it helps in showing the information which is being displayed.
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
Based on implicit leadership theory, Employees have leadership prototypes, which they use to "<u>decide whether a leader is effective based on their perception of how the leader should look and act."</u>
<h3>What is Leadership Prototype?</h3>
Leadership Prototype generally occurs when people evaluate or assess a leader's effectiveness.
Leadership prototypes are implicit leadership whereby individuals use the cognitive indication of an actual or abstract leader believed to possess all leaders' attributes.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is to "<u>decide whether a leader is effective based on their perception of how the leader should look and act."</u>
Learn more about the Leadership prototype here: brainly.com/question/9772602